Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The spoils of war:Iraqis face the dire prospect of losing up to $200bn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 08:30 PM
Original message
The spoils of war:Iraqis face the dire prospect of losing up to $200bn
Iraqis face the dire prospect of losing up to $200bn (£116bn) of the wealth of their country if an American-inspired plan to hand over development of its oil reserves to US and British multinationals comes into force next year. A report produced by American and British pressure groups warns Iraq will be caught in an "old colonial trap" if it allows foreign companies to take a share of its vast energy reserves. The report is certain to reawaken fears that the real purpose of the 2003 war on Iraq was to ensure its oil came under Western control.

The Iraqi government has announced plans to seek foreign investment to exploit its oil reserves after the general election, which will be held next month. Iraq has 115 billion barrels of proved oil reserves, the third largest in the world.
According to the report, from groups including War on Want and the New Economics Foundation (NEF), the new Iraqi constitution opened the way for greater foreign investment. Negotiations with oil companies are already under way ahead of next month's election and before legislation is passed, it said.

The groups said they had amassed details of high-level pressure from the US and UK governments on Iraq to look to foreign companies to rebuild its oil industry. It said a Foreign Office code of practice issued in summer last year said at least $4bn would be needed to restore production to the levels before the 1990-91 Gulf War. "Given Iraq's needs it is not realistic to cut government spending in other areas and Iraq would need to engage with the international oil companies to provide appropriate levels of foreign direct investment to do this," it said.

Yesterday's report said the use of production sharing agreements (PSAs) was proposed by the US State Department before the invasion and adopted by the Coalition Provisional Authority. "The current government is fast-tracking the process. It is already negotiating contracts with oil companies in parallel with the constitutional process, elections and passage of a Petroleum Law," the report, Crude Designs, said. Earlier this year a BBC Newsnight report claimed to have uncovered documents showing the Bush administration made plans to secure Iraqi oil even before the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US. Based on its analysis of PSAs in seven countries, it said multinationals would seek rates of return on their investment from 42 to 162 per cent, far in excess of typical 12 per cent rates.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article328526.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to mention the 200 billion that Wolfiwitz says they owe U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. See we have to stay to protect our oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I found this part interesting...
Earlier this year a BBC Newsnight report claimed to have uncovered documents showing the Bush administration made plans to secure Iraqi oil even before the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US. Based on its analysis of PSAs in seven countries, it said multinationals would seek rates of return on their investment from 42 to 162 per cent, far in excess of typical 12 per cent rates.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Like I said time and time again, they hate us for our greedom. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here's more info on that (it was Greg Palast covering) >>>>
Last Updated: Thursday, 17 March, 2005, 15:41 GMT

Secret US plans for Iraq's oil
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/4354269.stm

Two years ago today - when President George Bush announced US, British and Allied forces would begin to bomb Baghdad - protesters claimed the US had a secret plan for Iraq's oil once Saddam had been conquered.

In fact there were two conflicting plans, setting off a hidden policy war between neo-conservatives at the Pentagon, on one side, versus a combination of "Big Oil" executives and US State Department "pragmatists".

"Big Oil" appears to have won. The latest plan, obtained by Newsnight from the US State Department was, we learned, drafted with the help of American oil industry consultants.

Insiders told Newsnight that planning began "within weeks" of Bush's first taking office in 2001, long before the September 11th attack on the US.


So, the U.S. *will* get ahold of Iraq's oil revenue. It's just that instead of using that money to pay for the cost of the invasion, it will go to the neocons' oil baron buddies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. "Within weeks" of taking office, eh?
Like, perhaps, at those closed-door energy policy meetings, maybe?

http://www.newsobserver.com/114/story/367595.html

It's all starting to fall together now, isn't it? The neocons see the approach of peak oil, and decide they have to win the 2000 election no matter what. Once that election is stolen, they secretly meet with big oil to divide up Iraq's spoils. Larry Franklin keeps the Israelis informed while the terrorist money line is secured with the help of http://www.911digitalarchive.org/crr/documents/992.pdf">Jack Abramoff's Suncruz casino operation. The PNAC's "Pearl Harbor event" goes as planned, taking out the CIA station at the World Trade Center as well as the DoD's counterterrorism planners in the Pentagon, in order to cover their trail. After that, it's simply a matter of forging a case for war, helped by a sprinkle of anthrax.

The plan is ruthlessly protected, from concealing the details of the energy policy meetings to interfering with Senate and FBI investigations to the outing of Valerie Plame. The President's reelection is secured with the help of Diebold and ES&S, and half a billion dollars' worth of smear.

Think about it all for a minute before you laugh. It's not as crazy as it sounded last year, is it? What has changed, besides confirmation of some of our worst fears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Doesn't sound crazy at all. That's what's scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. It all fits...
Yes, it does all fall together. Sometimes, schemes like this succeed simply BECAUSE people think it's all too outrageous, too crazy to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. 2,000,000 barrels/day, at $50+ per barrel. Where is THAT moolah going?
Not to its rightful owners, that's for damn sure.

That $100,000,000+ must be ending up in SOMEONE'S pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gronk Groks Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. It was always the Oil...
...everything else was a sham. It was always for the Corporations, never for America.

This mis-administration has been the most criminal cartel in living memory. It even beat out Nixon, which I thought was impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. We stick the American poor with the bill. We can damn-sure do it to Iraq.
Fucking pukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. hmmmmmm
wasn't that part of the pre-'constitution' order things put in place by bremer? i recall plans to essentially hand over their oil interests to the usual suspects. 'contracts' and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. In a companion piece
the Independent adds:

On the eve of the war in Iraq, there was a shocking moment of clarity in the Commons when Jack Straw revealed that when it was all over, France and Germany would not be allowed to "get their snouts in the trough".

This public slap in the face to Britain's biggest EU partners gave an insight into what was really concentrating US and British minds. Having constructed a tortuous case for war over Iraq's lack of co-operation with the UN security Council, plans were being laid for post-Saddam Iraq excluding non-coalition countries.

Straw's remarks revealed the focus on Iraq's oil. The World's four oil giants (BP, Exxon, Chevron and Shell) , have been desperate to get back into Iraq, since being booted out in the nationalisation of 1972...

Iraq's new constitution - practically written by US and Foreign office advisors, guarantees a major role for foreign companies. Production Sharing Agreements would hand over control of dozens of oil fields, like the giant Majnoon.

...
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article328527.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Also on the eve of war Bu$h cautions the 'enemy'
to not damage the oil infrastructure in Iraq. As I listened to that statement I had a :wtf: moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. Questions by the neocons on what is fueling the insurgency?
They need to look no further than the fuel tanks in their SUV's. We're an occupying force that is robbing them blind, and they wonder why they hate us??? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. as always -- follow the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC