|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 09:07 PM Original message |
White House Backs Dividing Appeals Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serryjw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. They have wanted to do this for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. omg it really is Orwell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. Democrats better fight this hard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lori Price CLG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. Justice Department endorses dividing 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The INjustice Dept is a BushCo tool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. "Improve the Administration of Justice" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anotherdrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. they MUST NOT get away with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE these morons want to screw with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bacchus39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 05:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. the size of the 9th Circuit is necessary for the continuation of justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. of course it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ugarte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Imagine an all-Bush appointed Court of Appeals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StopThief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
12. My assumption is that this would not necessarily. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bacchus39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 05:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I believe you are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BJW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 04:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
31. Yes--there'd be separate appeallate seats established, for one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StopThief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. If that's so. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
15. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. Congress looks at dividing 9th Circuit court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingyouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Scary but not surprising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fenris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Wasn't this recently shot down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. getting Brown off the court was sure nice. good things never last. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zinfandel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Can you believe this bullshit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Read the linked article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. kind of like redistricting in Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Well, the area is just barely contiguous, except Alaska, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never cry wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. But, they would add judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. they're trying to split the more liberal Oregon and Washington |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. the sheer size? well let's split up scotus too then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. don't worry...whatever that was...i'll be looking forward to another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BJW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. B'SHIT B'SHIT B'SHIT!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. What a surprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
29. The size of the 9th circuit is a canard; if the 9th circuit rendered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
33. Well, SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC