Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Backs Dividing Appeals Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 09:07 PM
Original message
White House Backs Dividing Appeals Court
White House Backs Dividing Appeals Court
By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer

Tuesday, November 15, 2005
(11-15) 17:28 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

The Justice Department is backing efforts by congressional Republicans to split up the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's largest federal appeals court and the frequent source of anti-Bush administration rulings.

"The department believes that dividing the 9th Circuit would improve the administration of justice," Assistant Attorney General William E. Moschella wrote in a letter released Tuesday by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., an advocate of breaking up the San Francisco-based circuit.

"The sheer size of the 9th Circuit has led to serious administrative difficulties that have adversely affected its ability to render justice efficiently," Moschella wrote.

The letter was addressed to House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., who is pushing legislation to break up the circuit that covers nine Western states, arguing it's too big to be effective.
(snip/...)

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/11/15/national/w172816S54.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. They have wanted to do this for years
the will never have a majority in the 9th circit but if they break it up they will get TWO! Watching to see how they break it up will be fun. It will deliberate judicial gerrymandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. omg it really is Orwell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Democrats better fight this hard
Democrats had better fight on this issue. Republican want to do more than just break up the 9th, they want to pack all of the courts with extremist judges. This is one of the most important issues for America's future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Justice Department endorses dividing 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Justice Department endorses dividing 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals 16 Nov 2005 The (in)Justice Department is backing efforts by congressional Republicans to split up the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's largest federal appeals court and the frequent source of anti-Bush administration rulings.

"The department believes that dividing the 9th Circuit would improve the administration of justice," Assistant Attorney General William Moschella wrote in a letter released Tuesday by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., an advocate of breaking up the San Francisco-based circuit.

<snip>

Lori Price
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The INjustice Dept is a BushCo tool.
16 Nov 2005 The (in)Justice Department is backing efforts by congressional Republicans to split up the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's largest federal appeals court and the frequent source of anti-Bush administration rulings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. "Improve the Administration of Justice"
Music to the ears of those who have no use for the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. they MUST NOT get away with this
I hope to fucking god the dems are ready to filibuster this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE these morons want to screw with?
By the time we run these criminals out of town, they will have totally destroyed every shred of what we once called justice and democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. the size of the 9th Circuit is necessary for the continuation of justice
and democracy? I think this is a little overblown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. of course it would
why would anyone think otherwise? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Imagine an all-Bush appointed Court of Appeals
Mind-boggling, a Christian Taliban in every seat. Surely Demos will fight this, or will they??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. My assumption is that this would not necessarily. . .
have to open up new seats. Am I wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I believe you are correct
Congress I believe sets the number of judgeships. the split could result in the same number of judgeships, more, or less
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Yes--there'd be separate appeallate seats established, for one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. If that's so. . .
what is the purpose of saying the current Circuit is too large and unwieldy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. Congress looks at dividing 9th Circuit court
they're at it again

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/16/bush.9thcircuit.ap/index.html

The Justice Department is backing efforts by congressional Republicans to split up the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's largest federal appeals court and the frequent source of anti-Bush administration rulings.

"The department believes that dividing the 9th Circuit would improve the administration of justice," Assistant Attorney General William E. Moschella wrote in a letter released Tuesday by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nevada, an advocate of breaking up the San Francisco-based circuit.

"The sheer size of the 9th Circuit has led to serious administrative difficulties that have adversely affected its ability to render justice efficiently," Moschella wrote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Scary but not surprising.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Wasn't this recently shot down?
Man, they never quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. getting Brown off the court was sure nice. good things never last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Can you believe this bullshit?
No matter how far Bush sinks...the neocons continue onward with their agenda, business as usual, just keep plowing away to insert their fascist ideology, philosophy to control the all courts in our country with right-wing extremism...The only place left for fair hearing is the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Read the linked article.
Edited on Wed Nov-16-05 06:20 PM by MrMonk
It makes sense to split the largest circuit into two smaller circuits for administrative purposes. You could still wind up with two of the largest circuits in the country.

The proposed split seems weird, since it separates Nevada and Arizona from California. This arrangement would create a new circuit covering two non-contiguous regions.

Correction: Nevada is contiguous with Idaho. However, both Nevada and Arizona districts face issues that are much closer to those faced by California than to issues faced in the northern tier of the 9th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. kind of like redistricting in Texas
one mile wide, three hundred miles long and a figure forty-three triple toe loop in dallas.

Makes perfect sense to them of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Well, the area is just barely contiguous, except Alaska, but...
Edited on Wed Nov-16-05 06:18 PM by KamaAina
where would the 12th Fascist Court of Appeals be seated? Seattle? Kind of far from NV and AZ.

And make no mistake, it would be the 12th Fascist Court of Appeals. On the surface, of course it makes sense to have two manageably sized circuits instead of one huge one -- but the repukes are using that as an excuse to rip six states away from sane, reasonable liberal jurisprudence and place them under something similar to the Scalia/Roberts wing of the Extreme Court. :scared:

Edit: No "sacred" icon :-), plus, if the repukes were so all-fired concerned about the administrative issues, they'd simply transfer a number of judgeships from the 9th to the new 12th Circuit, rather than stacking it with Federalist Society/Opus Dei sock puppets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. But, they would add judges
I remember when this idea first surfaced a month or two ago the article said that they would have to add i believe it said "dozens" of judges. And, guess who will get to appoint said judges?

It's a power grab to move the judiciary even farther to the right. If they say they want to do it for convenience I say fine, wait til 2009 then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. they're trying to split the more liberal Oregon and Washington
away from the more liberal California and Hawaii and lump them together with the more conservative Rocky Mountain states

and it will allow more openings for the Bushies to try and fill with their minions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. the sheer size? well let's split up scotus too then
If this comes to pass it's time for Kalifornia to secede and start charging a poll tax on any remaining republicans.

These people are nuts - they spend their whole day every day trying to figure out a way to turn this country into Taliban Lite and take it back to a simpler less confusing Ozzie and Harriet fantasy world that never existed to begin with.

They are just certain that Americans are going to just meekly put up with being told what they can and can't do with their bodies and lives merely because it's "the law". All "the law" does when it is unjust is inconvenience the people it is meant to control. All this effort to twist other people's lives into some bizarre notion of propriety in your own life, and all that will result is that you inconvenience people.

Putting the american taliban into the judiciary all the way from appeals to supreme court just means that the judiciary will become meaningless, if they succeed at this transparent ruse.

And when America is half and half Christian and Muslim and hard line muslim mullahs rule the bench from appeals to the supreme court and "One Nation Under Allah" is on our currency because they believe that god belongs in government and the constitution is changed to read a marriage is between one man and as many women as his father chooses, then they'll really be in a pickle, because that is where all this horseshit is heading.

And we'll be off in Canada laughing at their stupid asses commuting on horseback to work from their candle-lit homes because they never bothered to even start looking for renewable energy . . . I'll help build the wall to keep out the "illegal immigrants" if they're republican.

:rant:

okay, glad that's over. sorry, don't know what came over me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. don't worry...whatever that was...i'll be looking forward to another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. B'SHIT B'SHIT B'SHIT!!!!
The Ninth is big, but it is well-known as the most efficient circuit court in the entire country.

The repugs have been slashing funding for the Ninth and then claiming that it's not as functional as it could be, when the truth is that it's the unnecessary funding slash that's been creating some problems for the Ninth.

Breaking up the Ninth is completely unnecessary. It will create more bureacracy, more costs and more inefficiency. It's just a repug ploy to create a whole new judiciary with lots of appointment potentials for repug supporters.

M'f'ing a-holes just won't stop!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. What a surprise
NOT..

The golden fleece for the republican party is really court control, through lifetime appointments.. They can control the public better if only THEY are in charge of what's legal and what's not, and who gets punished and who does not.

Every law made by congress can be (and often is) challenged in court. Having their own cronies in those spots can allow them to continue to rake in the loot, while punishing anyone who dares to try it themselves or who dares to question them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. The size of the 9th circuit is a canard; if the 9th circuit rendered
decisions that the right liked, the issue would never have been brought up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. Well, SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC