|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
central scrutinizer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:37 PM Original message |
White House fires back at Democrats over prewar threat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. Dems didn't come to the same conclusions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. No, they just gave Congressional authorization to invade Iraq... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I'll agree with you there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. That's true. It wasn't popular, but they had the guts to do it anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Most of the House Dems voted against the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
84. My Congressman at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 03:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
72. See how this keeps playing out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
complain jane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. And yet it was still George W. Bush who started the war, wasn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 07:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
54. You are correct sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 09:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
59. And Still Yet, Shouldn't His Daddy Have Removed Saddam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprobate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #59 |
76. His daddy didn't remove Saddam for good reasons he has stated publicly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. No Democrat would have invaded AFTER weapons inspectors were finding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skylarmae (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. that's what I've been screaming at the tele - clinton had already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
44. Bush did squat about the U.S. ship that was attacked in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
35. The keep screaming that Clinton thought Saddam had WMD too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. That's why media pushed idea that IWR was a vote for war instead of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Ah yes. That's why they call it the "liberal media", huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 07:41 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. Care to point out the violation(s)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. He was to make that determination AFTER weapons inspections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 08:59 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Please point out the applicable tract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 09:31 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. You didn't post the entire IWR, you left out that weapons inspections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Please post the applicable tract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. You have one part of the IWR, post the rest that you mistakenly left out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Please post the applicable tract that I've "left out." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:23 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. That you left out on purpose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:33 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Please post the applicable tract that you pretend to know about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:45 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Not stalling...it's posted above...but YOU are the one deliberately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 11:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Nice edit. (6 minutes after my post) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 12:39 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. In another forum when you posted - and copying the final version of IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 06:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. Show me the REQUIREMENTS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SleeplessinSoCal (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
43. What is Hillary saying now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ah, yes. The "blame Clinton" approach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. Saying Saddam was a threat and invading a sovereign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. What! You peeked at the secret briefing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Oh, crap, I'm sorry.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nguoihue (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 07:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
51. Shouldn't invade N. Korea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. How many troops did Clinton get killed in Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. Clinton didn't invade, Scotty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99Pancakes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. So is he trying to look like a Democrat now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jedicord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. PNAC sent a letter to Clinton in 1998 requesting he invade Iraq... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. here's some of the text of that letter and signatories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jedicord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Thank you for the link, I've been searching for it for weeks now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 07:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
50. "F___ Saddam. we're taking him out." GWB - March 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
10. Really? And Bill Clinton invaded Iraq? Gee, I must have forgotten about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
37. Well, he did bomb the shit out of Iraq for several days in 1998 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueintenn (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yes, let's blame Clenis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marbuc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
12. If their intent were sincere they should have no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. Spokesliar wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
18. If that's "firing back", they're OUT OF AMMUNITION!! NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Sounds of desperation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
20. Chimpy's Conclusion: Invade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
22. But Clinton straightened all that out. Colin Powell said so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noahmijo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
23. BIG DIFFERENCE CLINTON DIDN'T GIVE IN TO THE PNAC AND INVADE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 05:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
48. Info the same, presidents change--and one insists on stupid war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bob3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
25. and yet they didn't invade - why Scotty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
27. These geniuses are taking on Bubba? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buford Pusser (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
29. It was all about the NUKES, which Dems said little about, if anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 01:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
78. yeah, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
30. Clinton and the Democrats did NOT fabricate evidence in order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximovich (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
31. The White House is Looking Mighty Childish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoddessOfGuinness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
32. If Dumbyass valued Clinton's advice so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
33. first clinton never invaded and occuppied Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
34. Snotty McFelon is just another wart on the ass of the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
36. clinton can make all the statements he wants/ed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
38. CLIIINTOOON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
39. All of these threads are correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twaddler01 (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
41. This is what happens when people to stand up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
45. With the tiny, itsy bitsy difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Roux Comes First (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
47. The Hubris-administration was fumbling handoffs from day one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
49. Who invaded Iraq, though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
53. At what point into Bush' second term does the statute of limitations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
55. Oh really. Is it STILL all Clinton's fault? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maggie_May (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
56. Do they think we are stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
65. Maybe they'd like to talk about who ARMED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:47 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Yeah Scotty, open up the books on IranContra and BCCI and clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 03:48 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. DicTatorTot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-03-05 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
69. Oh, Boo the fuck Hoo! Bush Admin. COULDA been great 'cept for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wise Doubter (458 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 04:10 AM Response to Original message |
73. And, I used to believe in Santa Clause for years....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 04:59 AM Response to Original message |
74. This is unbelievable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
77. uh, excuse me Scott |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
79. Word(s) for the day: "False Equivalence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twaddler01 (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. True... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gyre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
81. I can't wait to see that wanker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twaddler01 (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
82. McClellan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
85. OK Scotty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC