Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ridge Says U.S., EU Should Pioneer Biometrics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:46 AM
Original message
Ridge Says U.S., EU Should Pioneer Biometrics
Ridge Says U.S., EU Should Pioneer Biometrics
Wed October 29, 2003 10:35 AM ET

(Page 1 of 2)
By Mark Trevelyan, Security Correspondent

BERLIN (Reuters) - The United States and the European Union should lead the world in setting international standards for biometrics such as facial recognition technology, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said Wednesday.

Ridge said agreement between America and Europe on ways to combine fingerprints and facial recognition in travel documents could lead to a global standard. "First principle: trans-Atlantic agreement, U.S.-European Union agreement, leads the international discussion," Ridge told a news conference after meeting German Interior Minister Otto Schily in Berlin.

"I think the effort is to consolidate, harmonize the agreement between ourselves and then take it out to the rest of the world."

Schily told journalists: "We share the conviction that if different states work with varying standards, that will lead to confusion and make worldwide travel considerably harder."

more..............

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=2LWQ10PH31VMQCRBAE0CFFA?type=topNews&storyID=3714875
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. I deploy biometric solutions...
...and I'd never trust my civil liberties to them. It's a great way to keep the records of addle-minded CEOs secure, rather than asking them to adopt new complex alphanumeric passes every 30 days, but no way in hell would I consent to trusting my rights to biometrics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tom Ridge: facist scum.
biometrics are a violation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights...oh yeah, I forgot, no one seems to give a damn about those documents any more. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malachi Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tom Ridge too stupid to be a facist but,
I agree wholeheartedly on the scum part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. OT - Kef
If you cut the semicolon and "session data" out of your link, it won't break.

Like this (leave the question mark before the variable):

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=3714875
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks! I'll make a note of that from now on!
:hi:

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not sure facial recognition tech is advanced enough
Can it recognize the two faces of our politicians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, with training
Getting a computer to discern like a trained observer can also be used against the people who would naturally abuse such power. The trouble is the people want or expect lies from above. Take it but will not dish it out. I doubt any computer can be better than the the best human agent and operates mostly under the confidence system of the lie detector and the sign on the door: "Beware of Dog".

Also, as with amateur terrorists blundering with computers leaving wide information trails they can learn how to mask themselves. So by Darwinian selction, only the best trained terrorists will survive(mostly state sponsored as stands to reason) and a lot more schmoes will get rousted while the pall of fear under the Eye becomes an inescapable presence in the social psyche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Visa applicants to U.S. to face biometric tests
Seeking to plug a hole in the nation's border control system, the Homeland Security Department on Tuesday showed off its new entry-exit program for foreign visitors that uses biometric information - fingerprints and photographs - to establish identities.

The new system is intended to repair a flaw that allowed visitors to the U.S. to stay long past their visas' expiration - a flaw exploited by the 9/11 terrorists.

Starting January 5, all visitors requiring visas by the U.S. because of their nationalities will have their fingerprints electronically scanned and digital photos taken and entered into the system. The new U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology, or U.S. VISIT, is scheduled to be in place at the nation's major airports and seaports, including Chicago's O'Hare International Airport, by the end of this year.

http://www.etaiwannews.com/World/2003/10/30/1067477357.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC