Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush says Miers has experience, leadership

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:57 AM
Original message
Bush says Miers has experience, leadership

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/12853325.htm


Bush says Miers has experience, leadership


WASHINGTON - President Bush countered conservative displeasure Saturday with a detailed defense of his Supreme Court nominee, saying White House counsel Harriet Miers would bring to the bench vast experience in the courtroom and at the highest levels of government.

"No Supreme Court nominee in the last 35 years has exceeded Harriet Miers' overall range of experience in courtroom litigation; service in federal, state and local government; leadership in local, state and national bar associations and pro bono and charitable activities," Bush said in his weekly radio address.

"Throughout her life, Ms. Miers has excelled at everything she has done," he added.

A growing number on the right have expressed displeasure with Bush's selection of Miers to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Everything"?
That's what I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. "Throughout her life, Ms. Miers has excelled at everything she has done,"
George, you dumbass, she only seems so perfect because you fucked up everything YOU have done. By your standards, EVERYONE has excelled. If not for the money that Granpappy Prescott made doing busisness with Nazi Germany, you would be on a street corner somewhere, mumbling about how the voices in your head are telling you to invade Iraq and make a Palestinian homeland....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. I wonder if we'll find she had a stained "red" dress
if she is so good at EVERYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. No one believes the Liar...his pants emmitting smoke for 4 yrs now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. If the Repukes voted for Thomas, how can they object to Miers?
The bar is so low for Repukes it is in the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. bush said he found wmds in iraq too. Doesn't mean it's true, if we use
that particular litmus test -- whether or not he's a fucking liar just SOME of the time.

"On FRIDAY bush does NOT lie..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. What she has are the keys to all George's skeletons
and future indictments if we really still
had justice in this country. And what a way
to get a promotion, by waving those keys
in front of a boss's eyes. A win win for
both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Comparing her qualifications to Bush's:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Have any senate democrats spoken about her.
I don't thinks she is the right person for the job but the way the repugs are reacting to her nomination, maybe she won't be so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. "No Supreme Court nominee in the last 35 years has exceeded..."
yeah yeah yeah. try again george. just cause he says it, don't make it so. its like saying, 'well, hiring this arsonist as the fire inspector is a good idea because of his experience with fires'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. Soooo, she's better than Roberts? Then, why wasn't she nominated
for Chief Justice?

Why did he change the Roberts nomination?
If she is sooooo qualified.... why do all that bait and switch?

What a nimnal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush Addresses G.O.P. Unease Over Nominee
Bush Addresses G.O.P. Unease Over Nominee
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
The New York Times, October 9, 2005


WASHINGTON, Oct. 8 - After a blistering week, the White House is scrambling to control a conservative uprising over the nomination of Harriet E. Miers to the Supreme Court, with President Bush pitching his choice directly to the public on Saturday as his Republican allies plotted strategy to shore up support.

...

The conservative uproar over Ms. Miers underscores how difficult it has been for Mr. Bush to pull his own party together as he faces a variety of problems on other fronts: his administration's response to Hurricane Katrina; a leak investigation involving his chief political adviser, Karl Rove; the indictment of Representative Tom DeLay of Texas, who was the House majority leader; and, most recently, the decision by a top Justice Department nominee to withdraw amid questions over his ties to a Republican lobbyist accused of fraud.

Only a week ago, Republicans were saying they looked forward to a new Supreme Court nominee because it would give them something to rally around, providing a welcome distraction from the Bush administration's problems. But the nomination of Ms. Miers only served to roil a party that is already divided over domestic matters like Social Security and how to pay to rebuild the Gulf Coast.

Now, having alienated his conservative backers, Mr. Bush must go forward on the Miers nomination alone, without the help of many of the advocates who led the charge for the last nominee, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.
Okay, repeat after me: LAME CHIMP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. According to observers, Chimpster flung his feces at them, then
You know he wanted to.



------
progressive political cartoon
http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Her nomination should be the laugh of the week! Why ANYONE is
taking this seriously is a major wonder. Especially the Democrats. If they let this go through, I think we should immediately impeach any Democrat that votes for her as being a repub in Democratic clothing and put in a real Democrat with a real backbone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. he doth protest
too much..i.e. "no, no, she's really a conservative..she's not going to change AGAIN."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. There is no excuse for approving
her. The new issues are competency and cronyism. I don't see how the Dems. can possibly justify a third--COMPLICITY. They need to stand up and reject her as unfit for the job and inappropriate for the nomination. After all--this is our court of last resort. This is the highest court in the land--we should accept nothing less than excellence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. He did to them what he has always done to us. Deny our reality.
People say "she isn't qualified" he says "she's qualified" - in other words, he ignores what they say and re-asserts his fantasy island view over the perceptions of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I think people are finally getting it: He's friggin' nuts.
I always thought he was, but, finally, the rest of the world agrees with me.

It's a bit of a relief, I have to admit.

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. It is a meaningless statement
No person in the world would "exceed" the exact life history of another person. There is no metric for comparison - it is like saying no human being exceeds the particular DNA of another.

I doubt if there has been another nominee with such a thin resume as far as actually "judging" goes, though. We saw what this kind of unqualified cronyism can do in the case of Brown of FEMA. At least he had experience judging horses - maybe Bush should have chosen him for the Supreme Court instead of FEMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bush hits back as Republicans erupt over Supreme Court pick
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1588343,00.html

A beleaguered President Bush yesterday launched a counter-offensive against the conservative wing of his own party by defending his controversial pick of Harriet Miers to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court.

Bush was assailed by critics last week who lambasted him for picking someone they see as lacking the necessary conservative credentials for the post.

But Bush hit back, devoting his weekly radio address to defending Miers. 'Throughout her life, Ms Miers has excelled at everything she has done,' he said.

Stunned Democrats have watched as the usually disciplined Republican party has dissolved into a virtual civil war. Bush's conservative base has long anticipated a chance to put someone on the Court who will espouse right-wing and anti-abortion views but many view Miers as a betrayal of those hopes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwillalwayswonderwhy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. When are they going to realize
That the LAST thing a Republican politican wants is for Roe vs. Wade to go away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demos Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Astute Observation
That and tax breaks are all they have to run on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. What...did he smack around his teddy bear?
"bush hits back"...all bush knows how to do is send others to do his dirty shit for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. He probably thinks the same about himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. exactly.
unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yes, the grandiosity and narcissism is unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. Call me a sentimental old fool,
but what the hell has "litigation" to do with Constitutional Law?

Isn't that a bit like putting a high school biology teacher on a highly prestigious stem cell research team?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
26. She has a paper trail too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. Bush also said Brownie was "doing a heckuva job." n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. "The pResident is the most brilliant person I've ever met."....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
32. Right, and Quayle was a good speller.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC