Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Armstrong Williams May Return Some DOE Money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:02 AM
Original message
Armstrong Williams May Return Some DOE Money

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001220417

Armstrong Williams May Return Some DOE Money

NEW YORK Commentator Armstrong Williams is in negotiations to possibly return a portion of the $240,000 he received from the U.S. Department of Education for promoting the Bush administration's education policies.

The negotiations were reported Monday in USA Today and verified Monday morning by E&P Online. "He's been in negotiations since the summer," said Shirley Daze, director of communications at the Graham Williams Group (GWG) in Washington, D.C. It is not known how much of the $240,000 might be returned, but Daze said it won't be the whole sum.

Williams was criticized for taking the money in a U.S. Government Accountability Office report released Friday (E&P Online, Sept. 30). The nonpartisan GAO said the Bush administration violated laws prohibiting the use of covert propaganda when it secretly paid the conservative broadcaster/columnist to promote its education policies without disclosing he was on the government's payroll.

Williams -- who was not immediately available for comment Monday -- told USA Today he was paid only to produce ads and said negotiations to return part of his fees stem from the fact that he didn't fulfill the part of the contract requiring him to promote the No Child Left Behind Act. But the GAO report said: "It is clear to us from the monthly reports and invoices provided by GWG that Mr. Williams promoted the NCLB Act at the behest of the Department and that he thought it was part of the contract."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. What's to negotiate?
Just fucking give it back, you scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Probably Immunity to Any Charges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The administration is more culpable than Williams
how could the DOJ file charges against Williams and not the DOE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good. Phase II will be writing stories critical of Bush to counter the
bogus stories supporting Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hope my Brother realizes that they

treated him like he is an African American.

They haven't asked Halliburton to give back any money or Enron.


Look in the mirror my Brother, look in the mirror and see who you really are---a shill for Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Brother
you are heavy,all that shit inside your pointed lil head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Honor among thieves????
So, let me get this straight, he TOOK the money, and THEN welched on the deal???

:nopity: :applause: :applause: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why would he give any of it back?
As I recall, Walletfat ("Armstrong" just seems like the wrong name for someone in such a position) claimed that he hadn't done anything wrong, and that he'd earned every penny. Why would he give any of it back?

Although I note that Judas Iscariot threw the 30 pieces of silver back to the chief priests. Maybe that's what Walletfat plans to give back: 30 dimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainRants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the GAO find the payment was ILLEGAL?
If so, he should be required (under law...you know..that legal thing?) to return all of it? (plus interest?)

Afterall, a "moral" administration would agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC