Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Case Set Against (Christian) School That Fired Unwed, Pregnant Teacher

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:47 PM
Original message
Case Set Against (Christian) School That Fired Unwed, Pregnant Teacher
http://www.nbc13.com/education/5036497/detail.html?rss=bir&psp=news

Case Set Against School That Fired Unwed, Pregnant Teacher
--------------------
POSTED: 11:59 am CDT September 29, 2005
UPDATED: 5:04 pm CDT September 29, 2005
--------------------
BIRIMINGHAM, Ala. -- A case is set to begin in Birmingham federal court next month for a woman who is suing a Christian school that fired her after administrators learned she was unmarried and pregnant.

Tesana Lewis filed suit against Covenant Classical School of Trace Crossings, saying she was unfairly fired. The school contends her unwed pregnancy went against the values and religious principles taught there.

(snip)

Lawyers for the private religious school in Hoover say Lewis was fired because she was pregnant and unwed, which goes against the school's Christian teachings.

Her attorney states that whether she was married or not, the school fired Lewis because she was pregnant, a violation of the federal Title Seven, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender, race and religion.

(snip)



complete story: http://www.nbc13.com/education/5036497/detail.html?rss=bir&psp=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmmm.....I'm not familiar with Jesus of Nazareth
instructing people to shit-can unmarried pregnant women. Can someone point me to that chapter and verse? Many thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think his mother would have something to say on it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. LOL! You'd think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Cherry Tree Carol
Joseph was an old man and an old man was he
When he wedded Mary in the land of Galilee

When Joseph was married and Mary home had got,
Mary proved with child, by whom Joseph knew not.

Joseph and Mary walked through an orchard good,
Where was cherries and berries, as red as any blood.

Joseph and Mary walked through an orchard green,
Where was berries and cherries, as thick as might be seen.

O then bespoke Mary, so meek and so mild:
"Pluck me a cherry, Joseph; they run so in my mind."

O then bespoke Joseph, with words most reviled:
"Let him pluck thee a cherry that brought thee with child."

O then bespoke Jesus, all in his mother's womb:
"Bow down, then, thou tallest tree, for my mother to have some!

"Go to the tree, Mother Mary, and it shall bow to thee,
And the highest branch of all shall bow down to your knee."

Then bowed down the tallest tree, it bent to Mary's hand;
Then she cried: "See, Joseph, I have cherries at command."

O then bespoke Joseph: "I have done Mary wrong.
So cheer up, my dearest, do not be cast down!"

Then Mary plucked a cherry, as red as any blood;
And she traveled onward, all with her heavy load.

http://www.goldenhindmusic.com/lyrics/CHERRYTR.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Scuse me!
Where's the "Right to Life" Christians on this one? :shrug:

What? They don't want to support this woman to have this baby?!!!!?

Golly-gee-whillikers! They couldn't be complete a'hole hypocrites, could they?

:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think this is despicable
but let me play devil's advocate for a minute here.

First, since this is a private school, I don't think Title Seven applies. It is my understanding that unless the school is funded by tax dollars, they can discriminate all they want. But her attorney would be the expert, not me.

I also don't understand why she would expect to keep her job in a Christian school as an unmarried pregnant woman. I mean, it's kind of a no-brainer.

But at any rate, I hope she prevails and wins the suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I agree; awful behavior but not giving rise to civil liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. If they threw out every sinner,
there'd be no one left on the payroll. Why select who you fire by sin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Also, correct this law school graduate if I'm wrong, but ..
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 09:43 PM by Maat
isn't there an 1st-Amendment-related exemption for religious organizations applicable?

In any case, they are big-time hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Unless the school gets federal dollars,
they aren't obliged to abide by Title Seven regs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. But aren't labor laws applicable to every employer
public or private? I don't know much about this law, but I imagine it would fall under that realm...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. For schools,
the laws only apply if they get federal money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. So they can discriminate?
Why wouldn't they have to follow labor laws, as an employer? Maybe I am missing something, but I though title 7 applied to all employers, not just gov't ones.

I'm confused..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I think the Title laws
only apply if they receive federal funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Well that just sucks, then
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 10:45 PM by meganmonkey
I guess it makes sense - e.g. Catholic schools taught by nuns...but it certainly seems immoral to me, despite being legal.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. It is definitely immoral
but illegal? - I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. but just because it's a private school doesn't mean
it hasn't gotten title 7 funds... have they partaken in that * initiative to blur the line between private and public schools? If they have, then they're liable, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. True
So she may have a case. BUT I have taught in a couple private schools that were very reluctant to accept any federal dollars for precisely this reason - so they wouldn't be obliged to abide by Title regs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
To enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon
the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief
against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the attorney
General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public
facilities and public education
, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights,
to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a
Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the
"Civil Rights Act of 1964".

http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/vii.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That's where the exemption comes in.
When a religious org. establishes a social service agency, say, and they elect to receive public funding, they must establish a secular org. separate from their church org. And this new org must comply with the anti-discrimination protections.

But, as to their orgs which do not receive any federal or state funding, THEY get an exemption based upon the 1st-Amendment's Free Exercise Clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The school would argue it was part of their religious beliefs
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 10:29 PM by nvliberal
to not have unwed, pregnant women at their school. The woman has no case. Nobody forced her to work in a private religious school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. That's what I was thinking too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. nobody forces you to work anywhere
If employers can claim exemption from something because it's 'against their beliefs' labour laws are useless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
41. Yep, I'm afraid she will lose her case.
But maybe we can keep repeating the name of the school ... and show them for the coldhearted, arrogant jerks that they are; maybe their customer base will dry up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. If they receive "vouchers"
...then this should not happen.

By the way, what part of this sentence makes sense...

"I also don't understand why she would expect to keep her job in a Christian school as an unmarried pregnant woman."

Almost ALL unmarried pregnant women in this country ARE Christian. Should they all lose their jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Conservative traditional family values for all!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about Christ's "values and religious principles" of
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 08:47 PM by liberalhistorian
caring, compassion in all circumstances, forgiveness, not judging harshly, etc., etc., etc.? Any fundie even hear of those anymore? As a gal who was herself unmarried when pregnant, shit like this truly infuriates me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Borned-Agains' Next Step
I doubt that the so-called "born-gains" are really happy with just firing unwed, pregnant school teachers. I suspect that their real desire is to go back to the days when pregnant, MARRIED school teachers could also be fired for getting in a family way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I think that you are correct, VogonGlory.
I think they want to go back to a very patriarchal, repressive society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Perhaps...
Perhaps they (school officials) were trying to tell her that it would've been better if she'd got an abortion. </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. If a man working at the school got a woman, not his wife, pregnant,
would he be fired? Or would he get a raise since he would be owing child support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyJones Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. Or if she decided to get an abortion so she would no longer be
pregnant, would that have been more acceptable to the school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. And in a related story...
Christian School Expels Ontario Lesbian Couple's Child
Family Will Not Fight Expulsion

POSTED: 4:32 pm PDT September 23, 2005

Shay Clark was expelled from Ontario Christian School on Thursday.

"Your family does not meet the policies of admission," Superintendent Leonard Stob wrote to Tina Clark, the girl's biological mother.

Stob wrote that school policy requires that at least one parent may not engage in practices "immoral or inconsistent with a positive Christian life style, such as cohabitating without marriage or in a homosexual relationship," The Los Angeles Times reported in Friday's edition.

Shay and her parents said they won't fight the ruling. Stob told NBC4 that the expulsion was not a civil rights matter.

School administrators learned of the parents' relationship this week after Shay was reprimanded for talking to the crowd during a football game, Tina Clark said.

Clark and her partner, Mitzi Gray, have been together 22 years and have two other daughters, ages 9 and 19.


http://www.nbc4.tv/education/5014297/detail.html?rss=la&psp=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spangle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. If she Aborted the Baby, could she keep her job?
I mean.. if the issue was being an unwed bother..

that would sove the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
30. They sacked her for not having an abortion.
The most efficient way to eliminate any belief in God is for institutions set up in the name of God to treat people like shit.

I used to think I was a Christian, until I realised how Christianity was being warped by present governments. So I read the old testament carefully, and realised I could never follow a religion with such a bloody, barbarious background.

I would like to encourage people though, who can feel the presence of spirit, to keep that awareness in their hearts, and not let the evils of today's religions overpower it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorMyEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
31. What is the message they're sending to the students?
If you were a girl in this teachers class what message would you take from this? I think the school is hoping for something like "make sure I'm married before conceiving" - but, I think the lesson is more likely to be "hide your sins". These girls will be more likely to have abortions should they become pregnant, more likely to hide their pregnancies, run away from home in despair, and perhaps even damage themselves trying to provoke a miscarriage. And we wonder why fetuses and newborns end up in dumpsters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Well, when my mother was a teen
She had a friend who went to a local Catholic high school. This girl was class president, in National Honor Society, and was going to be the class valedictorian. When she got pregnant, she was informed that she no longer could be class president, in National Honor Society, or class valedictorian if she had the highest GPA. When she protested, they told her that she was lucky that they didn't expel her. I am not sure if that sort of thing happens at private religious high schools now or not.
The whole abortion angle reminds me of why my sister became strongly pro choice in high school. Many of the same anti abortion fundies made her feel firm in their beliefs. She had a couple friends who were pregnant and saw how they were treated. She said "They tell girls not to have abortions because to do so is a grievous sin yet when they see a pregnant girl they treat her much more like a sinner than the girl who had an abortion who they never knew was pregnant." If they are going to be anti abortion, they have to support pregnant women regardless of marital status. When they don't, they are actually supporting abortion. There are girls and women from "Christian" households who have abortions, against their moral judgement, because they couldn't stand how they would be treated as an unwed pregnant woman. This woman who is losing her livlihood is a perfect example of what happens when they continue their pregnancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. It's not too different now
Even in public schools: I had a friend who was in the "Homebound" program (where a teacher comes by several times a week to tutor, check homework assignments, etc.) for about a month before and after giving birth at 16. Despite the fact that she was doing the same work as the students in class and was getting A-level grades on all her assignments and tests, she was told that she couldn't receive any As for the classes simply because she was on Homebound.

Yet, the daughter of the biology department head and the school librarian, who was on homebound for almost two years because of anorexia and related mental issues, was certainly given As in all her classes: She was one of the senior valedictorians, with a straight 4.0 average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. the message is
boys can do whatever they wish, but girls will be held up for ridicule and abuse if they don't tow the line. Kind of sounds Taliban-ish to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. Umm...churches are exempt from Title VII
Next thing ya know, we'll be freaking out about church schools firing teachers because they discover the teachers are Jews and Muslims.

Here's what I figure. The people who pony up the Big Bucks to send their kids to this institution want two things for their children: for them to walk down the aisle as virgins, and for them to go to Bob Jones University. And it's pretty damn hard to get the point across that waiting for sex until you've graduated from BJU and gotten married is more fun than actually having sex, when there's a teacher standing there who's a triple sinner: not married, not a BJU grad and pregnant.

I don't think she has a case, but I do think she's got a chance of getting a job that pays much more than being a teacher in a fundie school...you know, something really hard to get like cashier in a home improvement store.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
38. once again
Yet again, we have to make a special exemption in our laws so the religious can maintain their primitive morality. Wouldn't it be great if religious groups were really the moral leaders they claim to be, instead of massive anchors to progress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
40. This woman's case depends upon if the school received federal funds.
I would argue ANY federal funds, either through Title I, Dept. of Ag (free/reduced lunch), or VOUCHERS would cause this school to be under the requirements of Title VII.

If they haven't received any federal funds, sorry to say, but this woman probably doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC