Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Airbus Jets Have History of Nose Gear Trouble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:14 PM
Original message
LAT: Airbus Jets Have History of Nose Gear Trouble
Airbus Jets Have History of Nose Gear Trouble
By Megan Garvey and Jennifer Oldham, Times Staff Writer


The problems with JetBlue Flight 292 marked the seventh time that the front landing gear of an Airbus jet has locked at a 90-degree angle, forcing pilots to land commercial airliners under emergency conditions, according to FAA records.

No one has been injured in the incidents. One involved another JetBlue flight into New York in November 2002, just three few weeks before a United Airlines flight into Chicago had the same problem, landing in a shower of sparks thrown from the nose gear after the tires ground down nearly to the axle.

Four of the earlier incidents — the two U.S. flights and two foreign — were traced to improper installation of a hydraulic shock.

The possibility of a faulty installation has led to three warnings about proper procedures in the past three years — advisories issued to airlines that included repeated cautions that failure to comply "is dangerous for aircraft safety."

In addition, the maker of the nose landing gear, Paris-based Messier-Dowty, said in a National Transportation Safety Board report dated April 2004 that the company had redesigned part of the gear to prevent the problem from recurring. But at that time, the company said it was awaiting approval of the redesign....


http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-jetblue23sep23,0,1294624.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I bet if the French gov't removed federal wage laws, brought Haliburton
in, and kicked everyone out of Paris, they would 'cut through the red tape' and get this problem solved!
:puke: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Q: What's the difference between an Airbus and a chainsaw?
A: About 2000 trees per minute.


This was big among Boeing pilots 8 or so years back.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seven incidents among thousands of flights, and it's a history of trouble?
Every aircraft design has flaws. I bet Boeing loves this story because Airbus Industrie has been eating its lunch lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. The only emergency landing I've experienced on an Airbus
was due to hydraulic problems; my flight was diverted to ATL (was supposed to be ORD-TPA). I had never heard of the landing gear problems until this JetBlue flight had its little problem...

I've never had an emergency landing on a Boeing plane although I got to experience an aborted takeoff, probably human error (another plane decided to partially stick its nose in the runway after we were cleared for takeoff).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC