By Mark Z. Barabak, LA Times Staff WriterA staff shake-up and slap from the NAACP this week are just the latest signs of the problems facing presidential hopeful Joe Lieberman, whose strategy for winning the nomination faces deep skepticism from many fellow Democrats.
Although he sits atop most national polls as the party's preferred candidate — thanks in large measure to his status as the 2000 vice presidential nominee — Lieberman is lagging in the crucial leadoff states of Iowa and New Hampshire.
Moreover, in a year when angry partisans are hungry for red-meat rhetoric from the Democratic candidates, the affable senator from Connecticut is taking a more subdued approach. "Democratic primary voters tend to be activists: environmental activists, civil rights activists, pro-choice activists," said Donna Brazile, who managed Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign. With Lieberman, "there's a failure to connect on a basic level with Democratic primary voters." ---
This time is different, Lieberman strategists insist, and some analysts agree that may be so. If, for instance, Iowa and New Hampshire produce different winners — and neither seemed to have much momentum — it could provide an opening for Lieberman, assuming he still had the financial wherewithal. ---
By the time Lieberman entered the race, many of Gore's old backers were already committed. ---
He may get credit somewhere "in another life," she said. "But not in this one. This is politics."