~snip~
Sen. Tom Harkin (news, bio, voting record), D-Iowa, said any legislation to pay for theoretical alternatives is a ploy by the White House to sink his bill, which would lift President Bush's restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Bush and many conservatives say such studies are immoral because the process destroys the embryo.
Harkin countered that paying for less-proven alternatives isn't right either.
"The method we're discussing today hasn't been published in a single scientific journal. It hasn't even cleared the peer review process. What's more, it's only been tried in mice. We're a long way from proving it works with human embryos," Harkin said in prepared remarks.
The scientists' methods got no friendlier reception from Sen. Arlen Specter (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa., the Republican chairman of the committee holding Tuesday's hearing. Specter, a cancer patient, said in an interview that he is growing impatient with the delay in studies on the all-purpose cells, considered by some to carry great promise in the search for cures of diseases like cancer, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.
~snip~
Set to testify are four scientists whose alternative research is being considered by Bush, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and other conservatives who want to vote for alternative stem cell legislation that does not destroy budding human life.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050712/ap_on_go_co/senate_stem_cells;_ylt=AsmLgNKbYzVVikX2u9E1Aj6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3b2NibDltBHNlYwM3MTY-