Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House to Vote on Cuba Travel before Recess

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:38 AM
Original message
House to Vote on Cuba Travel before Recess
Last Updated: June 18, 2005, 12:31 pm


House to Vote on Cuba Travel before Recess


US House of Representatives is slated to vote on Cuba policy prior to the July 4 congressional recess and non-government organizations have called public opinion to express their demand to end the travel ban on Cuba.

The White House and the congressional leadership have consistently thwarted the will of Congress and of the strong majority of U.S. citizens by removing the Cuba amendments from the final bill before it reaches the President for his signature, says the press release of the Latin America Working Group (LAWG).

LAWG expects an amendment will be offered by Representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ) to prohibit funds from being spent by the Treasury Department to enforce the ban on travel to Cuba. Not perfect, but the House leadership will not allow a free-standing bill on ending the travel ban to come to a vote.

According to the LAWG group, there will likely be similar, but more specific, amendments offered by various representatives: Rep. Lee (D-CA)-an amendment on educational travel; Rep. Davis (D-FL)-an amendment on Cuban-American family travel; Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY)-an amendment on ending the full embargo; Rep. Emerson (R-MO)-an amendment on agriculture trade sales and possibly others.
(snip/...)

http://webnewswire.com/article436875.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Want to sign the national petition on this issue?

Make your voice heard!
Sign the national petition on Cuba travel

For the past 5 years the House of Representatives has voted to end the ban on travel to Cuba. Each year, the bill is changed behind closed doors and the Cuba provision gets taken out. This is partly so that President Bush won't have to make a tough decision about signing or vetoing. As citizens, we're tired of this subversion of democracy.

Below you'll find a petition to U.S. lawmakers on Cuba travel policy. It demands that after they pass the amendments to end the travel ban, the bill must reach the President without changes. We'll be delivering it twice: once before the votes happen in the summer (this is soon, so act now!) and again in the fall, when they usually try to take the amendments out.

(snip)
http://www.lawg.org/tools/petition.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. this will never pass
the cubans here in miami are diehard rethugs. they will kick and scream bloody murder over this. the dems dont usually touch this issue either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If I remember my history correctly , the older Cubans in
Miami are the ones who fled Cuba when Castro took over. Most of them were wealthy Battista supporters uprooted by Castro. I am not an admirer of Castro by any means, but it seems to me for us to allow our populace to travel to Cuba it doesn't mean we support Castro. People who have not seen their families in years should be able to do so. The Battista regime was bad and the Castro regime is bad, but look what we have--one just as bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. In some ways maybe worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Castro was a huge improvement over Battista.
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 12:22 PM by Massacure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Castro's government is much, much better than Batista's
everything from health care to education to equity to standard of living to political freedom has improved (contrary to the propaganda fed to people on a constant basis).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Here's some stats to back that up..
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 03:34 PM by Mika
Before the 1959 revolution

  • 75% of rural dwellings were huts made from palm trees.
  • More than 50% had no toilets of any kind.
  • 85% had no inside running water.
  • 91% had no electricity.
  • There was only 1 doctor per 2,000 people in rural areas.
  • More than one-third of the rural population had intestinal parasites.
  • Only 4% of Cuban peasants ate meat regularly; only 1% ate fish, less than 2% eggs, 3% bread, 11% milk; none ate green vegetables.
  • The average annual income among peasants was $91 (1956), less than 1/3 of the national income per person.
  • 45% of the rural population was illiterate; 44% had never attended a school.
  • 25% of the labor force was chronically unemployed.
  • 1 million people were illiterate ( in a population of about 5.5 million).
  • 27% of urban children, not to speak of 61% of rural children, were not attending school.
  • Racial discrimination was widespread.
  • The public school system had deteriorated badly.
  • Corruption was endemic; anyone could be bought, from a Supreme Court judge to a cop.
  • Police brutality and torture were common.

    ___



    After the 1959 revolution


    “It is in some sense almost an anti-model,” according to Eric Swanson, the programme manager for the Bank’s Development Data Group, which compiled the WDI, a tome of almost 400 pages covering scores of economic, social, and environmental indicators.

    Indeed, Cuba is living proof in many ways that the Bank’s dictum that economic growth is a pre-condition for improving the lives of the poor is over-stated, if not, downright wrong.

    -

    It has reduced its infant mortality rate from 11 per 1,000 births in 1990 to seven in 1999, which places it firmly in the ranks of the western industrialised nations. It now stands at six, according to Jo Ritzen, the Bank’s Vice President for Development Policy, who visited Cuba privately several months ago to see for himself.

    By comparison, the infant mortality rate for Argentina stood at 18 in 1999;

    Chile’s was down to ten; and Costa Rica, at 12. For the entire Latin American and Caribbean region as a whole, the average was 30 in 1999.

    Similarly, the mortality rate for children under the age of five in Cuba has fallen from 13 to eight per thousand over the decade. That figure is 50% lower than the rate in Chile, the Latin American country closest to Cuba’s achievement. For the region as a whole, the average was 38 in 1999.

    “Six for every 1,000 in infant mortality - the same level as Spain - is just unbelievable,” according to Ritzen, a former education minister in the Netherlands. “You observe it, and so you see that Cuba has done exceedingly well in the human development area.”

    Indeed, in Ritzen’s own field, the figures tell much the same story. Net primary enrolment for both girls and boys reached 100% in 1997, up from 92% in 1990. That was as high as most developed nations - higher even than the US rate and well above 80-90% rates achieved by the most advanced Latin American countries.

    “Even in education performance, Cuba’s is very much in tune with the developed world, and much higher than schools in, say, Argentina, Brazil, or Chile.”

    It is no wonder, in some ways. Public spending on education in Cuba amounts to about 6.7% of gross national income, twice the proportion in other Latin American and Caribbean countries and even Singapore.

    There were 12 primary school pupils for every Cuban teacher in 1997, a ratio that ranked with Sweden, rather than any other developing country. The Latin American and East Asian average was twice as high at 25 to one.

    The average youth (age 15-24) illiteracy rate in Latin America and the Caribbean stands at 7%. In Cuba, the rate is zero. In Latin America, where the average is 7%, only Uruguay approaches that achievement, with one percent youth illiteracy.

    “Cuba managed to reduce illiteracy from 40% to zero within ten years,” said Ritzen. “If Cuba shows that it is possible, it shifts the burden of proof to those who say it’s not possible.”

    Similarly, Cuba devoted 9.1% of its gross domestic product (GDP) during the 1990s to health care, roughly equivalent to Canada’s rate. Its ratio of 5.3 doctors per 1,000 people was the highest in the world.

    The question that these statistics pose, of course, is whether the Cuban experience can be replicated. The answer given here is probably not.

    “What does it, is the incredible dedication,” according to Wayne Smith, who was head of the US Interests Section in Havana in the late 1970s and early 1980s and has travelled to the island many times since.



    No one can say with any credibility that universal education and universal health care is forced on Cubans. Castro didn't give it to them. All of the people of Cuba worked hard to create the infrastructure and systems that they felt were essential for any progressive system.

    Cubans wanted universal health care for all Cubans, and they have it. They pushed for government that represented their ideals, and organized and formed infrastructure that enabled Cubans to create a fair and complete h-c system. Cubans wanted universal education for all Cubans, and they have it. They pushed for government that represented their ideals, organized and formed infrastructure that enabled Cubans to create a complete and world class ed system, and they have it. Cubans want to assist the world's poor with doctors and educators, instead of gun ship diplomacy.. and that is what they have done WITH their government, not at odds with their government.

    Can Americans make this claim about their own country? I'm afraid not.


    Cubans want normalization between the US and Cuba, and they have thrown their doors open to us, but, it is our US government that prevents what the majority of Americans want their government to do - normalize relations. Worse yet, the US government forbids and has criminalized travel to Cuba by Americans - something that Cuba hasn't done.

    Poll: Americans don't support Cuban Sanctions
    http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=770



    Viva Cuba!




  • Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:30 PM
    Response to Reply #8
    9. Wow. Great info
    Thank you so much. I knew these kinds of numbers were true (actually, some of them surprised me quite a bit) but this puts it all in one place. Thanks again.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:02 PM
    Response to Reply #1
    6. Dems don't touch this? Ha ha think again..
    Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 03:09 PM by Mika
    Funny how facts get in the way of assumptions..

    charts from opensecrets.org





    Dems milk the 'git tough on Castro' crap as much as the repukes.

    They all need to keep Castro as the bogeyman. This goes for the embargo too.

    The reasoning for maintaining the extremist positions against Castro is for political gain, at the expense of the ignorant taxpayers who are brainwashed into thinking that Cubans are "fleeing" Castro, instead of understanding the actual Cuban-American community's immigration experience.

    Consider this.. If there were to be no Castro, then there would be no VERY profitable taxpayer funded anti Castro foundations and programs. If there were to be no Castro, who the F would Mel Martinez, Ileana Ros Lehtinen and the Diaz Balart brothers run against? They need Castro. Sadly this goes for Dems too (especially in Florida). Everything these so called "anti Castro" factions do, from taunts to threats of war to sanctions to embargoes, only unites the Cuban people behind their fearless and successful leader. This is what the "anti Castro" politicians and "free Cuba" foundations need - in order to continue to profiteer on the backs of the US taxpayers.

    Regrettably, it is not one sided profiteering. Perpetuating the embargo has a profit motive for US politicians representing both sides of the issue. No Castro = no anti Castro lobby (read campaign $$). No embargo = no pro trade w/Cuba lobby (read campaign $$). Hence, the embargo stays so the lobbying money pours in to both sides.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:14 PM
    Response to Original message
    4. To the Cuba news readers at DU, you may find this VERY interesting!
    June 18 / 19, 2005

    Librarians as Spooks
    The Scheme to Infiltrate Cuba's Libraries
    By DIANA BARAHONA

    The U.S. has been pretty successful at mobilizing world opinion against Cuba since the late 1980s. Emboldened by the fall of the Soviet Union it has gone to considerable trouble and expense to bring down the revolution that refuses to be defeated a scant 90 miles off the empire's shore. Part of this effort has involved creating an artificial opposition movement on the island and enlisting liberal organizations and intellectuals to support it. But U.S. librarians, targeted by name in the State Department's 400-page destabilization blueprint, the Report to the President of the Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba, not only refuse to play the game but are trying to assist their Cuban colleagues to improve their libraries.

    The rent-an-opposition has several components: independent trade union groups, independent journalists, independent political parties and independent libraries ­ all paid and directed by the U.S. Interests Section. They are also composed of the same people; one person may be an independent press agency, a political party, and run a library out of his house. The depth of U.S.-style "civil society" was evident May 20-21 at the Congress of the Cuban Dissident Movement in Havana. Financed with a special congressional grant of $6 million and featuring a videotaped greeting from Bush himself, this gathering was supposed to bring together 360 dissident organizations; it barely drew 100 people.

    Cuba not only has libraries, it has a lot of them ­ 400 to be precise, plus 6,000 school libraries. So why has the State Department created a network of independent libraries there? What exactly is an independent library? Rhonda L. Neugebauer and Larry Oberg, both university librarians, went to Cuba to meet with colleagues and study the library system in 2000. But they also visited the so-called independent libraries run out of people's houses. What they found were carefully-chosen drop-off and contact points for personnel from the U.S. Interests Section and others, who visited them on a regular basis to deliver materials and money. They also discovered that by keeping bookshelves with these materials in their homes, the "librarians" qualified for a monthly stipend ­ "for services rendered," as one of them put it. They found no evidence that anyone ever checked out a book, and when they enquired of neighbors, nobody even seemed to know the libraries were there.

    But the story doesn't end there. For years Neugebauer has been trying to set up a program of exchange and assistance to Cuba's real libraries, which not only lack funding for books and journals, but also for copying and computer equipment, and phone lines and technical support for internet access. But she and others are confronting a heated campaign to get the American Librarian Association and related organizations to condemn the Cuban government and support the independent libraries, waged by a New York librarian named Robert Kent.
    (snip/...)

    http://www.counterpunch.org/barahona06182005.html
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:34 AM
    Response to Original message
    Advertisements [?]
     Top

    Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

    Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
    Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


    Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

    Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

    About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

    Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

    © 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC