Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Restoring confidence of voters (Seattle PI)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 01:40 PM
Original message
Restoring confidence of voters (Seattle PI)
Monday, June 13, 2005

Restoring confidence of voters
Many call for election reform, but how and whether system needs changing still debated

By REBECCA COOK
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

According to the official record, 1,678 people voted illegally in Washington's 2004 election.

No one knows for sure who cast those votes or which candidates benefited. A judge decided that the fact the number of illegal votes dwarfs Gov. Christine Gregoire's 133-vote margin of victory doesn't merit ordering a new election.

But a new election system? If he had that power, Chelan County Superior Court Judge John Bridges might have liked to order such a thing.

"Extraordinary efforts are in place to make it easier to vote," Bridges said last Monday, when he ruled against Republican candidate Dino Rossi's bid to nullify the election. "Unfortunately I fear it will be much more difficult to account for those votes in the future."

Ultimately, Bridges said, election reform depends on the voters themselves -- pushing for new laws, demanding changes from their elected officials or simply taking more personal responsibility for voting properly.

<snip>

On conservative weblogs after the ruling, reactions ranged from an election reform initiative to sardonic tips on registering pets and deceased relatives to vote Republican in the future.
(Is this deliberate sabotaging of the election process? Or are they just venting off steam?)

(More)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/228214_greform13.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. watch how republicans handle being on the short end of a disputed election
Don't think for a minute they will "get over it", no sirreebob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baron j Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Probably all of those 1,678 voted for Dinosore Lossi
They can't help but beat on that felony voter drum. Now why can't ex-felon's vote? Seems a tad unconstitutional to me. Restitution is restitution.

1,678 really doesn't sound like all that much. Most likely most elections have errors in that tiny range. Now the shenanigans that went on in Ohio and elsewhere--those are real election problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC