Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slow response to CIA leak inquiry - MSNBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:54 PM
Original message
Slow response to CIA leak inquiry - MSNBC
Less than a day before the deadline to turn over documents related to the CIA leak investigation, only about a quarter of White House staffers had complied, White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Monday after President Bush reiterated his promise of full cooperation.

MORE THAN 2,000 White House staffers were asked Friday to review whether they had any information that might be relevant to the Justice Department investigation. In a memo obtained by NBC News, White House counsel Alberto Gonzales said all materials had to be turned in to his office by 5 p.m. Tuesday.
By early Monday evening, less than 24 hours before the deadline, only about 500 had turned in a signed memo and documents, McClellan said. Many were staff members who simply certified that they had no relevant documents, he added.

http://msnbc.com/news/973047.asp?0cv=CB10

I thought this story was about why it took 2 months for any actions to be taken in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SilasSoule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. What incriminating evidence is going to be found on Documents?
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 07:57 PM by SilasSoule
As a DU'er said here a couple of days ago. I don't think they wrote down "Expose Plame to get back at Wilson" on checklist somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Got Evidence?
Nope, not me. How 'bout you?
Nope. Got nuthin'.
Gee, too bad.

Ashcroft: Well, we looked and there was nothing there. Move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rate This
at the bottom of msnbc link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. So what else is new?
This is just pathetic!
It is like asking the bankrobber to hand over any
evidence of the bankrobbery.
They need to arrest and then go in on there own and
rip the damn place apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're just waiting for it to go away
and it will.

<sigh>

BTW-per previous poster- I'm sure somewhere in DC there's a yellowed piece of paper that states "Going to Dallas on Friday to off JFK, signed________". It's that old smokin' gun dontcha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think phone logs could be interesting, IF they are followed up...
with cellphone logs and lie detector tests. And remember, there are several officials at the White House that think Karl (almost certain to be one of the leakers) has gone too far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's a good point. The phone company will have unshredded records
that -should- be immune to diddling by ASScroft's cadre. Maybe.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imwatchingem Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wait! Are they looking for records pertaining only to Novak?

"The order covers all electronic records, correspondence, computer records, notes and calendar entries that could relate to the investigation of who disclosed the CIA officer’s identity to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, who identified the woman on July 14. Employees must sign a form saying they had turned in materials or did not have any items related to the investigation."

What about the other reporters that were said to have been called? Have I missed something? Is everyone else off the hook now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC