Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmaker directs military to change 'tragic' next-of-kin policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:43 PM
Original message
Lawmaker directs military to change 'tragic' next-of-kin policy
SAN FRANCISCO - After divorced parents waged a post-mortem custody battle over their son who was killed in Iraq, a federal lawmaker is directing the Defense Department to change its next-of-kin policy in hopes of sparing other families such grief.

Rep. Sam Farr, D-Calif., inserted a clause Wednesday into the Defense Department Authorization Act that would require all service members to designate who should receive their body if they die in combat. Service members would also have to periodically update or reconfirm their designation whenever they are deployed, according to the proposed legislative directive.

"The last thing our soldiers and their families need is confusion when dealing with a tragic death," Farr said.

The directive is part of a bill that was expected to pass in the House on Wednesday night and become law within a couple of months. It comes as a set of divorced parents in California and Oklahoma engage in a bitter - but not unique - dispute over the remains of their son.

http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/politics/11737154.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. by all means, lets make corpse-handling more efficient...
how about not making corpses in the first place!

I swear, this is bizarro world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. but that wouldn't benefit the military-industrial complex or the oil
companies... so bushco and the thugs would never go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC