Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rift Over Recruiting at Public High Schools

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 08:34 PM
Original message
Rift Over Recruiting at Public High Schools
Rift over recruiting at public high schools

A Seattle high school bars military solicitation, touching off debate over Iraq war and free speech.
By Dean Paton | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

SEATTLE – While most Parent Teacher Student Association meetings might center on finding funding for better math books or the best way to chaperon a school dance, a recent meeting here at Garfield High School grappled with something much larger - the war in Iraq.

The school is perhaps one of the first in the nation to debate and vote against military recruiting on high school campuses - a topic already simmering at the college level. In fact, the Supreme Court recently agreed to decide whether the federal government can withhold funds from colleges that bar military recruiters.

High schools are struggling with a similar issue as the No Child Left Behind Act requires that schools receiving federal funding must release the names of its students to recruiters. Some feel that's an invasion of privacy prompted by a war effort that has largely divided the American public. Others say barring recruiters is an infringement of free speech - and a snub to the military, particularly in a time of war.

<snip>


"Planned Parenthood, as far as I know, does not advocate or perform illegal acts. The US military does," Mr. Ludwig continued. The soft-spoken carpenter said he would not object if Army representatives came to Garfield to debate their ideas on torture or aggressive war. "What I object to is their coming here to recruit students to perform those acts," he said. "It's not about free speech."

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0518/p02s01-ussc.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Mr. Ludvig
And for Garfield high school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. direct the recruiters to the Young Repukes frat house or freerepublic.com
... silly me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, No Child Left Behind is an unfunded mandate that requires schools
Edited on Tue May-17-05 08:47 PM by Miss Chybil
to allow military recruiters to solicit children at school or the schools will lose federal funds? Can this administration get any more sinister?

I spent a long time in the Army. I was even in Marine Corps JROTC in high school. I loved it. (JROTC - not the Army.) I don't think this captive audience for the military recruiter is right, though. And, to be threatened with losing precious dollars if kids aren't lined up for the pitch?

No child left behind my ass.

On edit: What really makes this bad is the recruiters don't show up much at "rich" schools. They only go to the poor ones and these are the schools who are most desperate for the money. This really blows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. "No child left behind the front line"
You are exactly correct about recruiters not targeting more affluent schools, no one there has to put their ass on the line for a collage education. This is why Congressman Rangel pushes for a draft--if rich kids were forced to serve, there would be alot fewer wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Your subject line is great, but maybe you should say, "No poor child...
left behind the front lines." I think that would make a good bumper sticker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. True,& true
No Poor Child Left Behind
The Front Lines



good bumper sticker, horrible reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. To be honest...
releasing names is a bad thing, preventing them from coming on career day to recruit is also not good. Personally, I'd prefer them to be at the school where they can be watched and overheard by adults in case they lie or threaten, then have them be unsupervised in a parking lot or at the recruiting center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yeah, but it's not an either/or proposition. They WILL be doing both
if not this h.s., others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. In Tucson recently, they had to make the recruiters tow the line.
They were interrupting classes, taking kids out of classes for testing. Basically coming and going as they damned well pleased. Funny thing, the problems were reported at Tucson High, in a lower income area and with high Latino/black enrollment. Did not read of the same problems reported in the Tucson Daily Star for the east side (money side of town) high school, Sabino. Hmmmm.

Anyway the district passed rules that the military recruiters would be bound by the same rules observed by job recruiters and those from colleges: Once a week, in one part of the school, no wandering around during classes, no pulling kids out of class to gang up on them one at a time.

Parents need to get really proactive with this shit. These people are making contact with kids at an age when many naturally have problems with their parents. The recruiters know this about teens. They are preying on them at a time when most are at odds with parents from time to time and would like to get out. So they can court the kids for 2 years prior to their 18th birthday, at which point the kid can sign on the line. Gee, how about some parental notification about what is going on, or does that only pertain to young women with issues relating to sexual activity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Any student who wants to sign up is free to do so
It just takes a little initiative. Walk on down to the nearest recruiting office, probably at the mall, and you can sit down with the recruiter and listen to his con job. I certainly won't stand in the way of a young Republican who supports this war doing just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Misleading recruiting propaganda at HS awards ceremony
Edited on Tue May-17-05 11:02 PM by teryang
Representatives of the Marine Corps and US Army, purported to award "scholarships" putatively worth $18,000.00 and $36,000.00 to a few of the graduates of my child's high school at an award ceremony last night.

They claimed that these Montgomery GI bill benefits had already been awarded to graduates who had enlisted but not yet embarked upon their active duty commitments. This is my opinion is a misleading recruitment ploy. My understanding is that these benefits do not accrue until one has successfully completed their tour of active duty, which may be interrupted by death, disability, involuntary separation for convenience of the service; involuntary separation for misconduct, personality disorder, or in lieu of courts-martial; or that one may loss the entitlement for less than honorable discharge due to courts-martial sentence, involuntary administrative discharge, or conviction in a civilian court.

This misrepresentation is probably going on at hundreds of high school ceremonies across the country during graduation season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. do they ever visit places
like Christian Academies ( Assembly of God ) totally fundamentalist types of school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. www.militaryfreezone.org
In the Senate debates this morning, either Sessions or Brownback (I can't remember which) went on and on about schools which would not cooperate with military recruiters. Evidently, some judge somewhere backed up the schools in some situation, and he considered that judge activist, and threatened states which allow their schools to disallow military recruiting with the cutting of federal funds.

Please remember, if military recruiters are allowed into your or your children's school, then the Right to Free Speech also extends to the contrary view. You can ask for a table to be set up at which you can counsel the kids about the REALISTIC effects of enlisting.

An excellent resource is www.militaryfeezone.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC