Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon base closings hammer New England

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:45 PM
Original message
Pentagon base closings hammer New England
WASHINGTON — Once a bastion of the country´s Cold War defenses, New England was dealt the biggest blow Friday by the Pentagon´s recommended base closings, losing three major bases and absorbing nearly 50 percent of the net jobs cut nationwide.

Two Naval bases _ the submarine base in Groton, Conn., and the Portsmouth shipyard in Kittery, Maine _ and Otis Air National Guard Base on Cape Cod, were targeted for closure, slashing nearly 13,500 jobs in those three facilities.

A major realignment proposed for the Naval Air Station in Brunswick, Maine, would shift 2,400 jobs out of New England´s only active duty airfield and send the aircraft to a base in Florida.

...

The total job losses across New England would be 15,524, but they would be offset by about 1,000 net new jobs, mostly at Hanscom Air Force Base in Bedford, Mass., and Naval Station Newport in Rhode Island.

http://news.mainetoday.com/apwire/D8A2J2K83-132.shtml

I hope this isn't considered a dupe. The headline is pretty dramatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Farewell, Portsmouth.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. On another downbeat note
Our local red-state Bushbots here in NE FL are "ecstatic" that our bases will not only stay open but be expanded.

I assume this is some sort of payback to blue states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Rhode Island is actually gaining jobs
Two red state bases will be closed (from FL and GA) and their jobs sent here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Helllllo... yon Rep Senator who's been "danglin' in the wind" over the
Bolton nomination....

Could that be.... arm twisting..... by..... SATAN?

Sheee-it. They should at least ATTEMPT to be less transparent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Huh?
There is no comparison between what Florida and Georgia will see (Florida: the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Orlando & the Navy Reserve Center in St. Petersburg, big whoop) and what's closing in New England, especially Connecticut.

Pentagon Base Closings Hit Conn. Hardest
By LOLITA C. BALDOR, Associated Press Writer Fri May 13, 3:00 PM ET
WASHINGTON - The
Pentagon delivered its biggest blow to Connecticut, recommending the shutdown of four military facilities, including the U.S. Naval submarine base in Groton.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050513/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/base_closings_connecticut_1

While some bases will close, others will grow, absorbing personnel returning from overseas and leaving shut bases.
The Pentagon, for example, said Fort Bliss in Texas would pick up 11,354 troops; Fort Benning in Georgia would gain 9,221 troops; and Fort Carson in Colorado would gain 4,178 troops.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/arms_usa_bases_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #28
51. I live in Rhode Island
and work on the Naval Station - I guess I was expressing how glad I was to still have a job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
60. It's all about money folks.
Base closings, push for tax cuts for home builders, redevelopment, etc.. Can you say free land to the robber barons? I wonder how much of the land that bases are on would make prime high end gated communities? How about this? Free land to malwart so they don't have to go through the city council and the citizens anymore to open a store. Move the military out. Move wackenhut in, and you now have a privatized neo-con gulag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Copperred Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Secret Ploy to Deprive the North of a Defense?

Did they recommend any base closings in the South?

I wouldnt be surprised they are thinking 50 years ahead and don't want any bases in the enlightened north...

Someone best keep an Army up here...


2cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think it's a ploy to get support for the Nuke Option.
From my blog:

Earlier this week, the NYTimes mentioned this:


There are just four core centrists in the Senate, Mr. Chafee (Rhode Island), Ms. Collins (Maine), Ms. Snowe (Maine) and Mr. Specter (Pennsylvania). They are joined from time to time by mavericks like Senators John McCain of Arizona, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Mr. Voinovich of Ohio.


Now, check this out. All of those states are on the closure list. Here's the breakdown:

Arizona: 3 bases scheduled for closure
Maine: 3 bases scheduled for closure
Nebraska: 5 bases scheduled for closure
Ohio: 9 bases scheduled for closure
Pennsylvania: 13 bases scheduled for closure

Much has been made that this round of closures is the biggest ever, and it looks as though the more moderate the Congressperson, the more bases scheduled for closure (the outlier is Maine, with 2 moderates and 3 bases to close - but 3 base closures in a tiny state like Maine would hurt as bad, if not worse, than 13 in Pennsylvania).

Call me cynical, but I'm willing to bet that the White House would be willing to cross a couple of bases off that list - letting the Senator or Congressman take credit for 'saving' the base - in exchange for support of Frist's nuclear option.

More at http://www.blah3.com/article.php?story=20050513170152124

-as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Fort Drum survived again
despite overkill media fearmongering about it. Anyone with any brains knew it wasn't going to be on the list this time around but our sad local stations need something to report this month. I'd say there is our northern defense but they're always deployed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Base closings in Mississippi
Pascagoula Naval Station, closed.

Keeler AFB, Biloxi, "realigned" with net job loss.

Of course, Sens. Cochran and Lott haven't weighed in yet.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Pascagoula has been on every hit list since Moby Dick was a minnow
And Lott's been 'saving' it every time.

Wutta guy, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Groton
is maybe hour and a half from NYC? Having a naval base there is not a deterrent? Port Security? Plus isn't there a nuclear facility somewhere in the area too? New Haven? Not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. New York has its own Coast Guard base for security.
Deterrent from what? The US military is to fight their naval battles on the other side of the Atlantic and Pacific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. Actually, it probably isn't
Groton just *happens* to be close to NYC. It could have been located anywhere in the Northeast. Grotons where it wound up and that's where it is.

Naval defense of NYC, in the highly unlikely event it is needed, would be by conventional naval ships and more likley air cover.

The actual threat of a true military invasion aimed at NYC is as unlikely as boyking saying he was wrong about everythng and becoming a regular and valued DU poster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. The problem is space
Modern armies and air forces need a lot of real estate -- you won't find the necessary open space here. The army and air force spends millions deploying forces to the west coast and southwest for large training exercises.

There were actually many closures in the South. The Navy, for example, is closing their only two naval stations in the Gulf of Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. You seem to be a Naval Historian, so please explain this
We have nuke boat stations in each of the four geographic corners of this country. Groton, Charleston, in Washington State (or Oregon?) and California. There's a reason for that symmetry, isn't there?

Nuke boats, unique to any other ship in the Navy, need highly specialized bases. They don't just pull up to the municipal pier, load a few crates of oranges to prevent scurvy, and head back out to the bounding mane.

Nuke boats are a very real part of our very real need to maintain a defense that is ever vigilant (even when the boyking is out mountain biking). Until every last nuclear weapon in the world is destroyed, we need to maintain this defense.

Groton (the nuke boat base) and Electric Boat (the company that builds them) are inextricably intertwined. Lose Electric Boat and what do we have? The skills needed to build nuke boats are unique among marine construction. (Can you say 'zero tolerance welds' when building deep dive pressure hulls?) If these skills are lost, how do we get them back?

It is clear to me that politics is at play with these base closures and anyone who denies that is simply out of touch with reality. Politics is hardball and base closing debates are the big leagues.

But closing this base, among all the others, borders on criminal.

Why is this base selected for closing? Let's not be so cavalier as to say 'the problem is space'. Okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Wow.
Nice post! You must be smart! ("'zero tolerance welds' when building deep dive pressure hulls?")

Oh, wait... It's YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #32
53. The perceived threat has changed and there are fewer subs
Groton was well positioned to counter Soviet subs in the North Atlantic - that threat is rusting at the piers in Russia. There is no other threat in the Atlantic. China, on the other hand, is rapidly building a modern sub fleet. The Navy is in the process of increasing its submarine presence in the Pacific to counter this - they have moved three submarines to Guam and plan to move more. So a combination of a smaller US submarine fleet with a desire to increase our presence in the Pacific left the Navy with too few subs to spread around and still have Groton make economic sense. Norfolk is a bigger base with plenty of pier space available. It all ready a major submarine base so there are no infrastructure issues. It is also the headquaarters of Commander, Submarine Forces Atlantic. It is close to the nuclear shipyards in Newport News Va. Subs out of Norfolk can handle the Atlantic and the Med just fine.

Nuclear subs are also built in Newport News VA - they share construction of the new Virginia class SSN.

The Navy had to chose between Groton, Norfolk, and Kings Bay as their sub base on the East Coast. Kings Bay is the Trident base so it is not going anywhere while Norfolk is the largest naval base in the world with a concentration of supply, admin support, and training that allows for economic efficiency. Groton had no advantage over Norfolk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
62. Why, we outsource the sub-building industry to China, of course!
All in all, a pretty :puke: inducing decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maine and Connecticut
they both have senators that may not vote with them on SS and who knows what else. Is this to punish or to use as a bribe to move them over? Snowe, Collins and Leiberman he needs them for any vote on his planned destruction and maybe he wants to hold this up as a prize, they'll keep the bases open if they vote their way. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. See above post.
There's a reason that the announcement of the pending Nuke Option followed so closely on the heels of the base closings.

These guys don't do anything without a political motive. I talked to Randi Rhodes today about it, and she thought it was kinda out there.

I think they planned it to work this way. Call me cynical.

-as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. Not out there at all
they plan everything, even things that seem odd at the time have some goal. I'm glad you talked to Randi about it cause maybe she will connect the dots now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Vote Blue and get your base closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Texas loses 15, Alabama 11, Georgia 7, Oklahoma 6, Missouri 6
for some people, voting red had the same effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Check and see if they aren't small facilities and not Bases, in the Red
States. The list I saw said Georgia only lost some small "training facilites," and other Military research installation facilities which will be combined.

I think the Northeast and California got hit with true Base closings. I didn't go beyond Georgia and SC which really didn't lose bases but had some "rearrangements which will lose some jobs but will be offset by gains in others. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. No real net loss here in OK (Chimp country). All major bases safe,
and a few reserve units will glob together...actual employment will rise considerably. I'm sure the figures can be found on any of our media sites www.kotv.com www.ktul.com www.kjrh.com
and so on...was top story on all local news at 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Please, don't make an equivalency between a fucking Reserve station
and a nuke boat base. They're not the same. To count numbers is not only disingenuous, it is tantamount to a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #33
48. If I didn't muck up in transcibing, Red States +11861 Blue -24289
There is a very real net change of Militray and Civilian jobs from Blue states to Red states going on on this list.

Don't get me wrong, our military is much bigger than it needs to be to defend the country and any closing is probably for the better. But it does bother me to see states rewarded for voting for the chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. Yup, there ya go
Those are the raw numbers. The 'logic' it took these assholes to get there is what also needs to be looked at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #54
65. I give up in formating this, but the numbers speak for themselves
-2018 California
-8586 Connecticut
91 Delaware
-6496 Distict of Columbia
-298 Hawaii
-2698 Illinois
-6938 Maine
9293 Maryland
491 Massachusetts
125 Michigan
-262 Minnesota
4 New Hampshire
-3760 New Jersey
-1071 New York
-1083 Oregon
-1878 Pennsylvania
531 Rhode Island
56 Vermont
760 Washington
-552 Wisconsin
-24289

2664 Alabama
-4619 Alaska
-550 Arizona
3585 Arkansas
4917 Colorado
2757 Florida
7423 Georgia
-659 Idaho
2197 Indiana
-6 Iowa
3582 Kansas
-3658 Kentucky
-1297 Louisiana
-1678 Mississippi
-3679 Missouri
-124 Montana
-213 Nebraska
1059 Nevada
-2849 New Mexico
-422 North Carolina
-2645 North Dakota
241 Ohio
3919 Oklahoma
709 South Carolina
-3797 South Dakota
1088 Tennessee
6150 Texas
-446 Utah
-1574 Virginia
-251 West Virginia
37 Wyoming
11861
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
63. You are kidding--right?
Texas gained 6150
Alabama gained 2664
Georgia gained 7423
Oklahoma gained 3919

Missouri is the only one that lost--3679

That is a total gain of 16,477 redistributed to those states.

So tell me again what your point was between the red and blue states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lizzie Borden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Yup! That's what's goin' on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
66. Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner!
Edited on Sat May-14-05 12:13 PM by KevinJ
I admittedly don't know this, but I'm guessing Texas got off either very light or entirely scott free in terms of base closings.

on edit: Oops, just read post 18, pardon my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. New England is now defenseless..
real enemies gotta love 33 b.c.s on FRIDAY the 13 TH

BUt its all part of the busheviks plan to destroy the USA cuz they HATE freedoms..

Russia and China be luvin this day..

busheviks do nothing that will not benefit their private plans and their role in the globalist agenda

as goes the USA
so goes the rest of the so callled FRREE WORLD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't rule out good old fashioned pork in the equation
Ed Schultz was on a major rant about Ellsworth in S.D., how the jobs lost there were getting outsourced to Texas. I wonder if they'll end up in Bug Boy's district?

Has anybody done an analysis of which states have the bases which "won" in this round?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Here's an Acrobat file that lists everything.
What's closing, what states 'gain,' what's being consolidated.

http://www.defenselink.mil/brac/pdf/Appendix_C_FinalUpdated.pdf

I looked at it briefly, but didn't really dig too deep.

-as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Democrats should try really hard to snag Snowe's Senate seat now.
Republicans are not going to be popular in Maine after this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
55. whats funny is that most republicans in Maine don't like Snow
Edited on Sat May-14-05 07:52 AM by Maine-ah
and Collins, because they don't tote the party line.

The republicans I have seen on local message boards are just fine with these closings, but that is obviously not representative of the state, that's just a couple of locals.

As I understand it, Bush reviews the closing list in Sept. Then he has 45 days for changes/recommendations. So we're not looking at anything permanent until possibly Nov. or even the beginning of next year. We have time to pressure our reps. and we need to start now. Not only can't Maine afford to lose these jobs, but the security of our country can't afford to lose so many bases on the coast.

AND.. It is so WRONG to use something like this as leverage against the blue states. I think it's pretty obvious what Bush Co. is trying to do with this, and the fact that more blue states are losing more bases/jobs than the red states, should be sending some kind of warning flag up to the people of this country.


(edited for stupid spelling mistakes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Simple equation: Thousands of blue state jobs to red states.
Keith Olbermann showed the red/blue map from Election 2004 with base closing job numbers superimposed on it. Couldn't be more obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drduffy Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. got that right
one more step in the 'dom' process. Get ready to be fighting in the streets. That's what this means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minkyboodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. anyone have screen cap from that
I'd love to see it as it would convince this friend I have to finally come over to our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Coundown is ready to air in repeat Midnight EST
And an MSNBC link: "Base closure list becomes battleground
Pentagon proposes closing 33 large bases, some 150 smaller sites."

“The battle starts today,” said Gerry Tarantolo, mayor of Eatontown, N.J., which is home to Fort Monmouth, a base that would lose all its 5,272 military and civilian jobs, according to the Pentagon proposal released Friday.

An angry Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., vowed to “fight like hell to change it. I’m not about to let the Pentagon’s error put the fort and the soldiers it serves in harm’s way.”

And Rep. Rob Simmons, R-Conn., voiced his opposition to a proposal to close the Naval Submarine Base in Groton, Conn., which would mean losing some 8,000 jobs. "I'm surprised and I'm shocked," Simmons, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, told MSNBC. "We are going to fight this decision," he added, noting that the committee's chairman also opposes the closure.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7834939/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. And some Republicans are Ticked, too.
Republican senator vows to fight
Among the major proposed closures is Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota, home to 29 B-1B bombers, half the nation’s fleet of the aircraft, and the state’s second largest employer.

That would deal a potential political setback to Republican freshman Sen. John Thune, who had claimed he could protect the base if elected during his campaign to defeat former Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle.

From same link, above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Here's that Strange thing about this though
Edited on Fri May-13-05 11:07 PM by AuntiBush
Notice the drastic changes, below, according to MSNBC, then notice "WHO BENEFITS." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7834939/

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld also recommended closing the Naval Station in Pascagoula, Miss... a blow to Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss...

Naval Submarine Base in Groton, Conn... 8,000 jobs gone.
Fort McPherson in Georgia, nearly 4,200 jobs gone;
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Maine, which now has 4,200 jobs - adios.
Cannon Air Force Base/New Mexico, could lose more than 2,700 jobs - cya.
The Naval Station in Ingleside, Texas, costing more than 2,100 jobs.

WHO BENEFITS:

TEXAS: Fort Bliss - Army
Naval Shipyard - Norfolk, Va.
Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland

2 surround the Hill; 1 the Ranch. Just a strange thought there.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. That's an interesting observation, Auntie
Seems to me that centralizing things also consolidates potential targets, too. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Exactly. Or something else.
April: Maryland seen it's share of possible Marshall Law rehersals. Though the news reported is as terrorist practice runs, it was rumored all over the place "ML."

BWI Airport
Frederick, MD (very near Camp David).

Just some differnet angles/thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Can't spell. Heading for snooze land.
Sleep has been so disrupted from this adm# I've literally lost tons of sleep, honestly.

Now... all one can hope for is not to get too tired to pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Personal guess:
they want to turn ALL their focus on Iraq and possibly Iran next. Let it never be said that these guy's aren't determined.

They're going to cut expenses any way they can...so they can win what they see as a losing battle in Iraq. They remind me of Captain Ahab, who was hell-bent on capturing the White Whale. He was so maniacally determined on getting it that he wouldn't listen to anyone. And it sent him to his death.

That's the mentality we're dealing with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #41
59. any setback for Thune is good.
Hopefully he will not be reelected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. The NeoCons are punishing liberal New England.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. I can't get over the plan to shut down Groton.
I grew up in New London. That sub base and General Dynamics Electric Boat are the lifeblood of the whole area. It's an important base.

I'm just scratching my head. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Joementum's Sword of Damocles.
Do you realize how much pressure they can put on Lieberman with that potential closing?

And if he caves and supports whatever hare-brained bullshit Bush wants him to support, think of what a hero he'll be when he calls a press conference to announce that he's 'saved' Groton.

Think of the boost it'll give his campaign - especially if he announces it on the eve of the primary election.

-as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. If Lieberman caves, he's a textbook, clinically defined asshole
In the end, Groton won't close. Portsmouth may, but not Groton. Reason and brains will prevail. I say he calls bullshit on Rove and tell him to just fucking try. Every admiral from here to Subic Bay will be calling for Rove's fat, mushy ass on a silver platter served up by a steward in the wardroom.

Worchestershire sauce will be optional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Speaking of admirals
I would love to hear from Admiral Crowe on this, along with General McPeak and General Clark!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Well, the GOP can give up on NH and Maine for a generation
I grew up in both states. There will not be another Republican elected for a long time. The Rethugs must be panicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. They're giving them up to lock in Florida, imho. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. Do we need all those nuclear subs, and if so why?
Why do we need them for? Protect us against Godzilla? The harsh reality is that the military-industrial complex profited for years by fanning the fears of the barbarians at the gates of freedom. The end of the Cold War, and the incredible access we got to the Soviet archives, have shown that the Cold War was a fraud perpetrated on a gullible public by the US government. Let's scrap the instruments of the Cold War, and let's do Rumsfeld one better by replacing the Pentagon with the Department of Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
49. Are they trying to keep Snowe, Chafee, and Collins in line?
Maybe the administration is not concerned so much with closing New England's bases as holding up a heavy bargaining weapon for keeping any possibly wayward, moderate Northeast congressmen from straying out of goose step with the party line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. That doesn't make any sense.
This will only turn people in those states against bush (more so than they are already) and will give their congressional representation all the space they need to tell him to go fuck himself on a variety of issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. That's Okay
The more people are angry, the sooner they make changes. And when the pockets are empty, the red bases will go, too. Then maybe we'll have some peace on earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. But maybe they don't really intend on closing those bases
Edited on Sat May-14-05 08:03 AM by Snellius
Now let's say that Olympia Snowe really does go along with the Bolton nomination she seems inclined against, or to help pull the switch on the "nuclear option", and, lo and behold, our benevolent despot, out of his ever-generous kindness and appreciation, rules to relent his draconian sentence and lets the condemned Maine shipyards live to build another day. The Russian Czars used to use the trick of reprieving a convicted political dissident just minutes before the execution squad ordering "Fire". A grand gesture of the mercy of the ruler. And an obligation to the poor condemned subject who was now forever in his debt.

Rove reads his history. But, then again, look what happened to the Russian Czar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Bingo!!!
I'm beginning to think this way, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #57
67. Have you met her, MaineDem?
It just occurred to me that you might have. If so, is she a prize bitch or a surprisingly nice person despite her politics? Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. But that would be "playing politics with national security!"
Oh wait... :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
61. So Conneticut is to lose it's National Guard base
National Guard is for state use, how can the Feds take it away? I guess this Administration is really out to destroy the National Guard especially in Blue states so when/if the time ever comes when a state has to defend itself from a Federal government goen mad it will have no resources. I would think every single state would be up in arms over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
64. Bush's big wet kiss to Lieberman. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC