|
When I started graduate school in history I was going to prove the absurdity of the Magic Bullet. I checked everything--bullet trajectories, pristine bullet theories, firing tests done with Oswald's rifle, seating arrangement in the limosine, body positions based on the Zapruder film, history of Oswald's life and recent activities. I even worked for a year for Ralph Yarborough, who was in the motorcade when Kennedy was shot, and was a close friend of JFK's.
Proved the opposite. There is no way that bullet could have done anything other than what the Warren Commission (which is wrong so often it galls me to admit it got something right) claimed it did. It came from the SBD window, it went through the back of Kennedy's shoulders, exited through the throat, then went through Connally, who was sitting inboard and lower down than JFK, and was twisting in his seat.
Any bullet that struck JFK would have had to go through him, since it didn't strike bone. There was one wound in the front, one in the back. JFK was hunched forward, so any bullet striking him in the front of the throat and exiting through his shoulder would have had to be fired from beneath him. Rules out every conspiracy position possible. The only person in front of him was Connally, and he was facing forward, but twisting slightly. One could make an argument that someone lying on the floorboard of the car fired a shot straight through Connally's wrist and chest, and it struck JFK in the throat then continued on to the SBD window, but that's just silly. We know Oswald was in the building. We know someone was firing from that window--there were three witnesses in the room below it.
Oswald fired that shot, or someone pretending to be Oswald fired that shot, from the SBD window.
Whether anyone put Oswald up to it, whether it was part of a larger plot involving LBJ or our government, I don't know. But the "Magic Bullet" is pure science. That came from where the WC claimed it did.
Interestingly, Ralph Yarborough almost always refused to talk about the assassination, because he was still hurting thirty years later because of it. I watched him get choked up trying to talk about JFK. Yarborough always claimed he had no doubt that Oswald, and only Oswald, fired the three shots, two of which struck JFK. But when asked if Oswald acted alone, he would refuse to comment. That's kind of where I am.
So I think people really want to believe really badly that there was a big conspiracy to kill JFK, because, as Jackie said, it seems wrong that he was killed by a pissant little communist (though he was more of an anarchist). And I think people are too willing to believe a lot of crap and bad speculation (save your energy, if you know about it, I've read it and considered it already) to prove that it couldn't have been that pissant little communist. But the evidence shows it was. Now the question that never gets asked, and I blame the conspiracy buffs for this, is who could have put Oswald up to it. See, I believe that if Oswald was acting for someone in the government, perhaps even LBJ, the greatest trick LBJ could pull to keep anyone from discovering that would be to convince the skeptics that Oswald had nothing to do with it. If no one looks at Oswald, no one will see why Oswald did it. It's the "Usual Suspects" syndrome: "the greatest trick the devil ever played was making people believe he didn't exist."
Or, Oswald may have acted alone, and LBJ and everyone else just got lucky. Stranger things have happened. But I've seen no evidence (and as I said, save your strength, I've seen it all) to suggest that Oswald wasn't the shooter.
I'm not going to check back on this post, btw. Every time I dump a book's worth of evidence on one of these posts I get hundreds, literally, of replies, and every one of them simply regurgitates the evidence I've already seen. I can disprove it point by point, but no one reads what I've written, they just dump the same old theories over and over, never once looking at the evidence that disprove those theories. So feel free to have the last word.
|