Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America's riotous real estate (and the full extent of the damage to come)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:04 AM
Original message
America's riotous real estate (and the full extent of the damage to come)
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 04:53 AM by Dover
Apr 20, 2005



America's riotous real estate
By Mike Davis

Last February the sirens howled in Hollywood as the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) rushed reinforcements to the 5600-block of La Mirada Avenue. While a police captain barked orders through a bullhorn, an angry crowd of 3,000 shouted back expletives. A passer-by might have mistaken the confrontation for a major movie shoot, or perhaps the beginning of the next great LA riot.

In fact, as LAPD Captain Michael Downing later told the press: "You had some very desperate people who had a mob mentality. It was as if people were trying to get the last piece of bread." The bread-riot allusion was apt, although the crowd was in fact clamoring for the last crumbs of affordable housing in a city where rents and mortgages have been soaring through the stratosphere. At stake were 56 unfinished apartments being built by a non-profit agency. The developers had expected a turnout of, at most, several hundred. When thousands of desperate applicants showed up instead, the scene quickly turned ugly and the police intervened.

A few weekends after this tense confrontation in Hollywood, another anxious mob - this time composed of more affluent home-seekers - queued up for hours for an opportunity to make outrageous bids on a single, run-down house with a cracked foundation in a nearby suburb renowned for its good schools. "The teeming crowd," wrote Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez, "was no surprise given the latest evidence that California's public schools are dropout factories."

..snip..

The great American housing bubble, like its obese counterparts in the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and Australia, is a classical zero-sum game. Without generating an atom of new wealth, land inflation ruthlessly redistributes wealth from asset-seekers to asset-holders, reinforcing divisions within as well as between social classes. A young schoolteacher in San Diego who rents an apartment, for example, now faces an annual housing cost ($24,000 for a two-bedroom in a central area) equivalent to two-thirds of her income. Conversely, an older school-bus driver who owns a modest home in the same neighborhood may have "earned" almost as much from housing inflation as from his unionized job.

The current US housing bubble is the bastard offspring of the stock-market bubble of the mid-1990s. Housing prices, especially on the west coast and in the east's Bos-Wash (Boston-Washington, DC) corridor, began to rocket in the second half of 1995 as dot-com profits were plowed into real estate. The boom has been sustained by sensationally low mortgage rates, thanks principally to the willingness of China to buy vast amounts of US Treasury bonds despite their low or negative yields. Beijing has been willing to subsidize US mortgage borrowers as the price for keeping the door open to Chinese exports.

Similarly, the hottest home markets - southern California, Las Vegas, New York, Miami, and Washington, DC - have attracted voracious ant columns of pure speculators, buying and selling homes in the gamble that prices will continue to rise. The most successful speculator, of course, has been George W Bush. Rising home values have propped up a stagnant economy and blunted criticisms of otherwise disastrous economic policies. The Democrats for their part have failed to address seriously the crisis of millions of families now locked out of home ownership. In a bubble city such as San Diego, for instance, less than 15% of the population earns enough to finance the cost of a median-value new home. ...cont'd

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GD20Dj01.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. The sunny side?
>> The southern California housing crisis, of course, has a sunnier side as well. In the past five years median home values have increased 118% in Los Angeles and an extraordinary 137% in neighboring San Diego. Homes, as a result, have become private automated teller machines (ATMs), providing their owners with magical, unearned cash flows for purchasing new sports utility vehicles, making down payments on vacation homes, and financing increasingly expensive college educations for their kids. Second mortgages and home refinancings, according to a Wharton Business School survey, have generated an astounding US$1.6 trillion in additional consumption since 2000. <<

If that's the upside, then California is well and truly screwed. Taking out a second mortgage in order to buy luxuries is economic suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I suspect it's for necessities, not luxuries
Admittedly, I don't know the numbers, but I have read that, during these abysmal Bush years, people have been taking out second mortgages to pay for things they once could have afforded in other ways.

No doubt they would have been better off in many cases if they'd changed their lifestyles. Still, that's not the same thing as taking out a second mortgage merely to buy a shiny toy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Lot's are buying shiny toys. I am amazed at the upgrading of homes,
new boats in the driveway, brand new giant SUVs and trucks for every member of the family and a spare. It's continuous consumption here in sunny California. My office mate, a Fundie GOPer who is always broke and contemplating bankruptcy, asked me in all seriousness if he should put a pool in his back yard, because his neighbor just did. (They don't even swim!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geekscum Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I once heard that the definiton of rich was......
Being able to pay for you live style and never a have to worry. That is why my wife and I save and and live within our means. If we do drop the plastic we make sure we can pay it when the bill is due. To borrow against one home for a car in what is clearly a grossly inflated market is insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberallyInclined Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. keeping up with the jonses and the real estate market-
he may be looking at it from a resale point of view-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The reference in the article was to luxuries
Vacation homes and sports cars are not necessities.

On the other hand, college education for offspring is certainly a valid priority, so I can see the temptation to incur risky debt for that goal. But the kids had better make straight As and refund their parents' debt load once they land a good job.

Assuming they CAN land a good job in *'s economy. Otherwise, yes, even a college education is a luxury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. My aunt's tiny little house...
We just sold my aunt's little house (four small rooms and one bathroom) for $190,000. This is in a working-class neighborhood, with a tiny front and back yard. The driveway has to be shared with a neighbor. I'm sure the recipient (nursing home) will be happy, but I think it's an insane price for a little house, and I'm dumbfounded that somebody actually bought it at that price. (I'm in NH).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I'm sure it has twice the square feet
of my tiny suburbian two bedroom condo which is now worth $180,000 and has no yard and one bathroom. Can I buy this size home in NH? I might have to move!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Reminds me of my mother's house
Small duplex, with a one-bedroom apartment on each side, not even room for laundry facilities, one-car garage that was showing a lot of wear.

It went for over $200,000 -- more than her asking price -- because of a bidding war between two prospective buyers.

This was in Austin, Texas, at the height of the tech industry boom. Then a year later, the tech bubble burst and people were caught with outrageous mortgages on houses that couldn't be sold for the price they'd paid.

Madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paper chase guy Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. My fiancee's grandparents' house is about that size....
And is worth around 500,000 in a neighborhood where houses are 500 - 800 grand. They do have their own driveway though. :) It's in Culver City, which I suspect is the suburb mentioned in the article that is known for its good schools. They've owned it since the late sixties, and prop 18 is a blessing for them, since they'd never ever be able to keep up with property taxes nowadays.

We've started saving up for at least a condo and everything here is currently 350,000 to 400,000. We're mostly looking towards saving up for what I believe is the impending burst of the bubble. I really hope that if it does happen, it happens before my parents retire and move back to California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. I never understood this...
Having a zillion dollars in home equity doesn't do you any good (unless yousell out completely and move to someplace cheap).

So what if you can borron $zillion against your equity? You still have to pay it back out of your working income. My salary certainly hasn't gone up like my home equity.

It's all money you have to pay back, out of an increasingly insecure job with stagnant earnings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Mind-boggling
Treating your home equity like an ATM is just insane, for the reasons you listed. It's an illusory gain unless you're on the brink of moving to somewhere substantially cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberallyInclined Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. wow- housing is expensive in San Diego-
who would have expected that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Welcome to Bush's "Ownership Society" 'eh? (spitting here) eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dupe--locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC