Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cardinals Again Fail to Elect New Pope

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 09:58 AM
Original message
Cardinals Again Fail to Elect New Pope
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=1&u=/ap/20050419/ap_on_re_eu/pope&sid=84439559

<snip>

"Black smoke emerged from the Sistine Chapel chimney again Tuesday as the scarlet-robed cardinals inside failed in two more ballots to elect a new pope to build on John Paul II's legacy and heal deep rifts within the Roman Catholic Church.

Several thousand pilgrims and tourists who packed St. Peter's Square to stare at the slender stovepipe jutting from the chapel's brown tiled rooftop gasped when the smoke appeared just before noon. The 115 voting cardinals sequestered in the chapel broke for lunch and reconvened in midafternoon for the day's final session of secret balloting.

White smoke — and the pealing of bells shortly afterward — eventually will tell the world that the church's 265th pontiff has been chosen to succeed John Paul, who died April 2 at age 84.

The smoke Tuesday morning confused onlookers for the second time in two days. But this time bells added to the uncertainty as well."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are they going to do this after every vote?
The vote up to 4 times a day and this can go on for months. Are they going to report it EVERY time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes.
It probably won't go on for months. However, this is a big story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. There's a limit to it
They elect a Pope with a 2/3rds majority of votes. They can try, and fail, up to 30 times. Then they go to a simple majority (50%).

They have two weeks' time for their first 30 votes. Then, if the voting is not concluded within a month, the world is destroyed by detonating the P (Pope) Bomb.

(I made that last part up.)

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Awesome, thanks!
I didn't know there was a two-week limit, thanks for the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. They CAN go to a simple majority, they don't have to. Personally,
I doubt that they would take that step unless the process drags on for a month or so. It would be real bad to have a 51%-49% Pope. Almost as bad as having a 5-4 President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Agreed. They pray for God to 'inform' their choices.
It wouldn't be good for God to 'inform' them all differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. John Paul II came up with the 50% rule,
and I heard a priest say last night on Nightline it's a bad idea because all a slim majority has to do is hang tight until the 50% rule
kicks in and then they are assured of getting their guy elected. Takes away the incentive to work toward a consensus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Beats workin' !
They probaly have full inboxes back where they came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. those damn activist cardinals
their filibustering is obstructing the installation of another infallable, celibate monotheist as the head of the roman empire's ghost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Perhaps they should appeal to the Supreme Court?
I'm sure they'd be more than happy to intervene and stop the counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC