Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A New Call to Arms: Military Health Care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 12:52 AM
Original message
A New Call to Arms: Military Health Care
The New York Times
April 14, 2005
A New Call to Arms: Military Health Care
By TIM WEINER

The battle over the Pentagon's billions has traditionally been fought between two forces - those who want more new planes and ships and tanks, and those who want more money for troops. Now there is a third: military health care. The cost of the main military health care plan, Tricare, has doubled since 2001 and will soon reach $50 billion a year, more than a tenth of the Pentagon's budget. At least 75 percent of the benefits will go to veterans and retirees.

Over the next decade, a new plan for military retirees, Tricare for Life, will cost at least $100 billion, according to confidential budget documents, rivaling the costs of the biggest weapons systems the Pentagon is building. The surge in military spending since the 9/11 attacks is slowing, and Pentagon officials say they may be forced to choose between the costs of new weapons and old soldiers. The Pentagon, said William Winkenwerder Jr., the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, faces "a growing, serious, long-term problem."

~snip~

Tricare for Life is one of a long list of assurances, like prescription drug benefits for the elderly, that Washington is making to American citizens at a rate of more than $1 trillion a month. The government's unpaid-for promises grew by more than $13 trillion last year, a sum larger than the nation's 2004 economic output, and they now surpass $43 trillion, said David A. Walker, comptroller general of the United States. Last year "was arguably the worst year in our fiscal history," said Mr. Walker, who runs the Government Accountability Office, the budget watchdog of Congress. "It seems clear that the nation's current fiscal path is unsustainable." Washington, instead of making painful choices, is paving that path with borrowed money and hundreds of billions of dollars of deficit spending.

Tricare, the overall military health plan, has nearly nine million beneficiaries. Its only cost to participants is an annual fee, no higher than $460 a year, covering all veterans and their families. Tricare for Life, which supplements Medicare, is free. It covers military retirees over 65, their spouses and, in some cases, their former spouses, for as long as any of them live. The number of military retirees is rising very slowly, toward 1.8 million by decade's end, because many veterans of World War II and Korea are dying. But Tricare for Life payments by the Pentagon will more than double, to $13 billion a year in 2015, from $6 billion last year. The money comes directly out of the Pentagon's budget for active-duty soldiers. Tricare for Life is the biggest part of a package of benefits for military retirees and their families that has been passed by Congress since 2000 and that will cost $150 billion from now until 2015.

~snip~

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/14/business/14retire.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well taht is waht happens when they replace the VA system
wiht all its problems, and it has many, with a PPO. We have Tricare Plus, we are vets... we transfered our Tricare from Miltiary to Civilian Care.. I KNOW I have costed them already plenty....

It was a no brainer, but I can see this as a way for them to try to get out of it.

Personally EVERY american should have the equivalent of Tricare and get rid of health care for profit, and that may still happen, after the depresion hits... it woudl be far more efficient, by the way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LosinIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Am I reading this right???ALL Vets and their families qualify
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 01:51 AM by LosinIt
for Tricare?? If so that would have been a great bit of info for the VA county advocate to share with us while I was out of work and my husband was trying to get VA bennies. We went 10 months w/o healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No.
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 06:55 AM by TahitiNut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I have been suggesting
the consolidation of federal medical programs for some time now. There would be one administration and everyone could chose their own doctors, ones who are close to their own home area. To honor the Veteran the card they recieve would have a V on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Mr. Frist and his family need to be put on the spot and explain why
it is that FOR-PROFIT HEALTHCARE COSTS SO MUCH?!?!?!

It's like one giant sucking vacuumn!!!!! The FOR-PROFIT HEALTHCARE COMPANIES live for their stockholders and no one else. Patients are just bodies with wallets to be milked.

Quit taking it out on the people, go after the CORPORATIONS controlling this regime in the White House!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton tried to tell folks
When Clinton was trying to get nationalize health care passed, he kept explaining that it was as much a budgetary issue as anything else. The US government is the single largest consumer of health care. Between the vets, active duty, as well as civil service and medicaid/care not to mention the "pass through" cost from military prime contractors, the US government is paying a boat load for health care and the cost is going up rapidly. It will ultimately be the single largest fiscal problem the government faces. This will happen WELL before Social Security has any problems. If we don't get control of the cost of health care soon, out national budget, and it's associated deficit issues, will be dominated by this one single issue. Nationalized health care _IS_ coming, it is really just an issue of whether it will be nationalized health care rationing, or nationalization of the industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. There already is national health care rationing
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 08:09 AM by htuttle
It's done on the basis of income.

The rich get 'top-notch' health care, and the poor get to stand in the emergency room when they start bleeding from something that could have been prevented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't really disagree
But the nature of the rationing will get vastly more complicated than that. We're talking about rules that say after some point in age, or infirmity, you won't be able to get treated at all. Oregon is already headed in that kind of direction generating lists of conditions that will and won't be treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC