Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Ethics Panel Finds Conflict With Senator's Job as Physician

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:06 PM
Original message
WP: Ethics Panel Finds Conflict With Senator's Job as Physician
Wednesday, April 6, 2005; Page A05

For years, Republican Tom Coburn juggled his duties as a House member and a family physician back in Oklahoma, where he delivered dozens of babies annually.

But since winning a Senate seat last fall, Coburn has clashed with Senate ethics committee members over whether he could continue to do double duty as a lawmaker and an obstetrician. Now, Coburn says, the ethics committee has ruled that his private practice constitutes a potential conflict of interest with his work in Washington, and it has given him until Sept. 30 to close his office in Muskogee, Okla. An outraged Coburn is vowing to fight the ruling, arguing that the panel's decision contradicts the Founding Fathers' desire for lawmakers to retain ties to their communities.

In an interview yesterday, he vowed to seek the backing of sympathetic grass-roots groups to try to persuade the panel to alter Senate rules and open the way for doctors in the Senate to see patients for pay.

"My hope," he said, "is to get a rules change that will allow me to continue to practice medicine."

Coburn and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) are the only senators who are physicians. For nearly two decades, Senate rules have barred members from holding outside professional jobs, such as those as lawyers, real estate agents and physicians, for fear that such services -- and compensation for those services -- might conflict with their role as policymakers. The Senate panel refused Coburn's request to grant him a special exception once he closes his business.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28320-2005Apr5.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. The D.C. pay schedule assumes the taxpayer
will be paying for a full time lawmaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. No problem...Just change the rules he doesn't like. Isn't that what
they always do? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Umm...shouldn't the Senate be a full-time job anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Resign
Not from his practice but the Senate is an option he should consider if he wants to continue "practicing his love on women as * put it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. D'oh!
This idiot is one of my senators! I voted for the other guy though, but the Oklahomans -- I've only lived here two years -- decided on the moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. wonder if Coburn's patients are illiterate
because I sure wouldn't want this guy to be my "physician"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21673-2004Sep14.html

Okla. Senate Candidate Is Accused of Fraud

TULSA, Sept. 14 -- One of the most competitive Senate races in the country turned nasty this week, as former GOP congressman and obstetrician Tom Coburn has had to respond to published reports that he committed Medicaid fraud 14 years ago.

The allegation stems from a medical malpractice suit brought by a 20-year-old woman who said that Coburn, without her permission, removed one of her fallopian tubes, which left her sterilized. The case never went to trial, but court documents first reported this week by Salon.com show that Coburn withheld information about the sterilization in submitting a bill to Medicaid for a related procedure involving a troubled pregnancy because the Medicaid program does not cover the sterilization of anyone younger than 21. Coburn said he withheld the information to ensure the woman was reimbursed for the cost of removing the other fallopian tube in which a fetus was lodged.

In an interview yesterday, Coburn denied that he had committed fraud or malpractice and accused his Democratic opponent, Rep. Brad Carson, of leaking the details of the case to the "liberal" Internet publication.

"This whole thing smells," Coburn said. "It's a coordinated effort to undermine my character. You are going to see this race change in the next 10 days. I am going to fight for my reputation."

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He steralized a patient without her knowledge?
Republicans really do think they are God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC