Egyptian Diplomat Rebuts Bush's Views on Mideast

[emad]

Notion of Sudden Democratic Shift Is Rejected

By Daniel Williams
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, March 10, 2005; Page A12

CAIRO, March 9 -- Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Wednesday offered a point-by-point rebuttal of President Bush's argument that the Middle East is opening to an era of democracy stimulated by the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

In an interview, Aboul Gheit criticized Bush's speech Tuesday to the National Defense University at Fort McNair, in which the president listed elections held by Iraqis and Palestinians and anti-Syrian demonstrations in Lebanon as signs that "clearly and suddenly, the thaw has begun" in the largely authoritarian Middle East.

"What model are we talking about in Iraq? Bombs are exploding everywhere, and Iraqis are killed every day in the streets," Aboul Gheit said. "Palestinian elections? There were elections seven years prior."

As for Lebanon, Aboul Gheit noted something that Bush did not: Tuesday's huge pro-Syrian demonstration mounted by Hezbollah, the Lebanese group that the State Department labels a terrorist organization. The rally showed that "there are other trends in society," Aboul Gheit said, warning that U.S. pressure might lead ethnically and religiously divided Lebanon into chaos.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21599-2005Mar9.html

[leftchick]

1. You Tell em!!!

It is very sad when we need a foreign diplomat to tell the US what is painfully obvious to the majority here on DU. Bush** doesn't know whatthefuckheistalkingabout!


<snip>

"Maybe things will get better, but we see what we see," he concluded.

Aboul Gheit also criticized Bush for suggesting that for Egypt to keep pace with the shift toward democracy, it ought to carry out specific reforms to ensure competitive presidential elections in September. Hosni Mubarak has been the uncontested president of Egypt for 24 years.

Aboul Gheit's comments were in line with Egypt's criticism of what it has termed U.S.-engineered "regime change" in Iraq as well as with what it regards as U.S. interference in Arab affairs. But the vehemence with which the former U.N. ambassador expressed his concerns came during a period of unusually tense relations with the Bush administration.

[sabra]

2. More here...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1299214&mesg_id=1299214