Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing boss flies into sex storm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:36 AM
Original message
Boeing boss flies into sex storm
BBC

Boeing chief executive Harry Stonecipher has stepped down after the firm asked for and received his resignation on Sunday.

The move followed an investigation into "a personal relationship between Stonecipher and a female executive of the company", Boeing said.

The US aerospace giant said that chief financial officer James Bell would replace him on an interim basis.

It also said chairman Lew Platt would assume an expanded role at Boeing.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4325769.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, They Fired the HIgher Ranked, Male Lover?
Either the Millenium has finally arrived, or it's a smoke screen for something much more heinous.

I'm betting on heinous financial or maybe political miscues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. And another CEO
Floats gently away on a golden parachute the size of South America. I'm starting to think these corporate monsters are deliberately sabotaging themselves so they can grab all their severence before the Dollar vanishes completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm wondering why there was no moral turpitude clause in his
golden parachute? Shouldn't they lose those benes if they do something that brings moral shame to the company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Who do you think creates these packages?
The ones who design these humongous rewards are the ones who will receive them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Oh you may have something there! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. My question is: why are they firing any one for something as innocent
and non threatening as sex? especially when mutual consent appears to be involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Some large corps
have anti-nepotism rules.

I know General Mills does. I don't know about Boeing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. A good question.
Although various places I have worked had "rules" against
shaggin your co-workers, they were uniformly ignored unless
some further misbehavior/malfunction/non-performance forced
the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan_Hoag Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Were they also selectively enforced against men?
I mean the "female executive" is not even named, much less fired.
It takes two to tango and to have sex. She is as responsible as he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm saying they were not enforced at all.
On those occasions when something was done because someone
shit on the floor in some other way, who got punished and how
was very political and tended to depend on what was good for
the higher level bosses, and it could go either way depending
on your EEOC climate, who "picked the winner", etc. Some
people are not allowed to fail, for instance, and it's not a
gender specific issue: look at Ms Fiorina, look at Ken Lay,
then look at Martha Stewart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan_Hoag Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. What I am asking is
that ok, a person does something else, they get fired for "having sex". But I can't imagine, in today's corporate climate, a woman being fired for having sex while her partner is not fired. However, the oposite happens every day.

"Gender equality" my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. So your beef is that women don't get in trouble for "sexual harassment".
That is true, in my experience, and it can be annoying,
unless they are really egregious about it, and then it is
called "stalking" or something.

However I do read stories now and then where some female
boss gets canned for shagging or harassing her minions,
but it's less common. I would say that power corrupts the
genders in much the same way, but the manifestations are
often different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Industrial Espionage?
An affair leaves one open for blackmail and pillow talk, I'd reckon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Good cover story for something else? Nothing like a sex scandal
to paper over any cracks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. Predecessor Phil Condit....any relation to Gary C?
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 09:02 AM by emad
Snip:

His predecessor, Phil Condit, resigned Dec. 1, 2003, as a result of the defense contracting scandals that ultimately sent two Boeing executives ex-Air Force procurement official Darleen Druyun and chief financial officer Mike Sears to jail.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=557586
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inslee08 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. No
No relation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. This sounds very strange
He had a consentual relationship with someone who "did not report directly to him". "The investigation determined the relationship... had no effect on the conduct of the company's business". And then he was fired? Why do I feel the whole story is not being told?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Setting aside momentarily
issues of poor judgment, the following facts are of concern:

1) Information was sent "anonymously" to the "legal and ethics leaders";

2) Suddenly on Friday, before any public announcement of the problem or of Boeing's decision, "the US Air Force lifted a 20-month ban that prevented Boeing from bidding for its satellite-launching contracts."

I don't have to go any further. You can figure the rest yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Dang, good research. The roadblock done been removed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. ACK! Here he is...
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 09:15 AM by Ripley


I think he is an ugly asshole with a wife, kids and grandchildren.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
artr2 Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. Was it raining tits??
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. This is odd
I wonder what the real story is? Stonecipher has been lousy ever since he came to Boeing.

I used to work with his wife in a charitable capacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
23. Anyone remember the Michael Douglas movie Full Disclosure,
based on the Michael Crichton novel? A very good movie which showed a man getting sexually harassed by a female superior. Folks complained about the movie as being unrealistic, since it's usually men pressuring women for sexual favors, but the movie actually did a good job of showing its male audience what it's like to be on the receiving end of this kind of abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Bu$h** contributor
STONECIPHER, HARRY C MR
CHICAGO,IL 60606
BOEING/C E O
4/20/2004
$5,000
National Republican Congressional Cmte

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?txtName=Stonecipher&NumOfThou=0&txt2004=Y&submit=Go%21

are Falwell and Robertson up in arms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Stonecipher!
Is he a Repug? If so, what does the "moral values" crowd have to say about him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. After Retiring From BOEING
I doubt very much that this is *only* about sex.

Boeing seldom "fires" anyone. Most of the terminations have to do with Alcohol or Drug abuse (on your next airplane ride would you like the plane to have been built by a drunk). One of the senior managers last fall was said to have bilked the company out of several hundred thousand dollars. He was not "fired" but he "left the company to pursue other interests"

Nepotism is rampant at Boeing. Some families have worked at Boeing for 3 generations. The only prohibition is that one of them cannot supervise the other. I have known a large number of married co-workers. Some of them working in the same organization.

In any event Harry's termination is one of the BEST things that could happen to the company. Ever since he took over the company in 1997 he has ran it into the ground.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC