Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top US general sees lasting Iraq insurgency:Richard Myers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 08:26 PM
Original message
Top US general sees lasting Iraq insurgency:Richard Myers
The insurgency in Iraq is not likely to be put down in a year or even two since history shows such uprisings can last a decade or more, the United States' top military commander says. Air Force General Richard Myers says that in the past century, insurgencies around the world have lasted anywhere from seven to 12 years, making a quick fix to the problem in Iraq unlikely.

"This is not the kind of business that can be done in one year, two years probably," Gen Myers said, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a speech to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council. General Myers was filling in for US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, who was scheduled to address the group but became ill after a long trip to Europe.

However, Gen Myers says recent elections in Iraq were a sign that insurgents were not succeeding in their efforts to strike fear in the Iraqi people. American television was full of images in January of Iraqis whose fingers were stained with indelible ink after casting their ballots.

"They were sticking that ink-stained finger in the eye of the insurgents," Gen Myers told a packed ballroom at the Beverly Hilton hotel. In Iraq, negotiations continued on Friday over who would lead the country's new government, talks made more complicated by delicate ethnic and sectarian issues. "There is a lot of tension in the system politically ... which is a very good thing" for a new democracy, Gen Myers said. The new government is expected to make security an immediate focus.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200502/s1311637.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. So exactly how many tens of thousands of "terrorists" will Amurka
kill in Iraq, how long will it take, how much debt will it put us in, who will hold that debt, and why are we killing Iraqis anyeffing way?

15 Saudis attacked us, period. We trained some of them, period. Amurka has lost her mind, period.

"Ray" on the other hand, was a great movie, I enjoyed it to the hilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Now they make statements such as this!!--educated people knew this
going into the war--but no one listend!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Prepackaged fear has a way of diminishing one's ability to perceive
what is real, and what is not. You must admit, these are some tremendous salesmen who have brought us pertual war for perpetual peace.


http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/156025405X/qid=1109383485/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-4459311-4676060?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/156025405X.01._PIdp-schmooS,TopRight,7,-26_PE20_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg
Product Description:
The United States has been engaged in what the great historian Charles A. Beard called "perpetual war for perpetual peace." The Federation of American Scientists has catalogued nearly 200 military incursions since 1945 in which the United States has been the aggressor. In a series of penetrating and alarming essays, whose centerpiece is a commentary on the events of September 11, 2001 (deemed too controversial to publish until now) Gore Vidal challenges the comforting consensus following both September 11th and Timothy McVeigh's bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City: these were simply the acts of "evil-doers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 10 years @ $100 billion/yr; 1000 soldiers' lives/ yr ; 50,000 Iraqis/yr
A lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdurod1 Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. But Hillary said the insurgency was winding down, didn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. The US killed 3,000,000 Vietnamese...didn't stop the "insurgency" there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Which is why Myers is saying we have another Vietnam on our hands
if the average American is perceptive enough to read between the lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Are we nuts are what? We have created more terrorist and hatred
toward us than any country in the world that I can think of.....junior is a fucking goddamn cocksucker, I hate his guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Myers is full of it
He is a master of diaster and a purveyor of cliches. His understanding of what is going on in Iraq is next to nil.

Governments resulting from colonial conquest are rotten with corruption and as the twentieth century saw again and again, invariably doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Myers is a tool of the Neocons-- a cold hearted hit man
The blood of thousands of children is on the hands of this very dangerous and evil man.

His planes have destroyed almost a hundred thousand lives.

For every innocent who has been killed, there are a hundred who have declared their personal to repel the invader.

This war will last until the last toothless rustic is driven from Iraq-Nam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. has this clown ever said a single sentence of value to anyone?
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 05:04 AM by thebigidea
I can't think of a single instance in several years of watching Pentagon press conferences when a Myers response wasn't completely
besides the point.

he's such a goddamn useless Rumsfeld stooge.

didn't the Joint Chiefs used to actually have some sort of power as opposed to being yesmen for Rumsfeld?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, there were intelligent men of integrity serving as the General
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 06:55 AM by ElectroPrincess
Staff in the Pentagon. However, you forget that was BEFORE they were purged by Rummy, i.e., ostracizing and/or forcing retirement.

You want to know a former Marine General with TRUE moral courage and integrity, I suggest you Goggle General (Ret.) Anthony Zinni. For example: http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/zinni.html

Unfortunately, nobody was (Aug 23, 2002), or is now listening, i.e. the whorish Corporate USA media is being controlled by our Executive Branch. :grr:

On Edit - another important link: His views have NOT change, this my fellow DU patriots is a man with moral courage and integrity:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/21/60minutes/main618896.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. sure, I know all about Zinni. twas a rhetorical question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Thanks ... I used it as an opportunity to bring his name up ; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The Military Leaders who defied Rumsfailed..
were asked to retire. The ones that are left just go along to get along.

Same went for the CIA.

The Bush Junta has nuetered most opposition in Amerika.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. Suppose we get a new kind of insurgent, one that opposes Islamic rule
because they prefer a secular government in which women are not forced to wear a veil. Should US troops be used then to combat such an insurgent? Should American troops risk their lives so that the ayatollahs force Iraqi women back to the Middle Ages?

The FUBAR possibilities are endless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. There are varieties of insurgents
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 09:48 AM by teryang
This possibility that you discuss is more likely with every day if reports of progress against the so called al qaeda faction represented by Al Zharquawi are true.

One could readily envision Sunnis from the old security service working for the US and/or inside the current Iraq "transitional" government and/or Sunni "insurgents" doing in the rival fundamentalist claimants to the national uprising credentials. I'm sure all four elements are riddled with duplicitous players communicating with each other.

Another problem is that outside states and intel agencies with various agendas may not want the direction and labeling of the "uprising" unclouded in such a manner. Nor would they like to see the emergence of either a more cohesive insurgency or a powerful stable state of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. Of course he knew this before... this type of war is discussed
at every staff college the US military has.

there are only two ways to defeat an insurgency, and the US is one of the few empires successful at both.

1. Make the enemy leave (ala American Revolutionary War)
and
2. Utterly destroy all traces of the culture of the occupied (ala American Indian Wars)

This is the biggest problem I have with this bunch of lying bastards, they know this, they knew this.. this is all planned, they are just waiting for the right time to start in earnest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC