Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DEVELOPING: Conflicting stories given for Iran blast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:58 PM
Original message
DEVELOPING: Conflicting stories given for Iran blast
The Associated Press
TEHRAN, Iran Feb 16, 2005 — An explosion was reported Wednesday in southern Iran near a nuclear power plant, with state-run media offering conflicting explanations for what happened, from blasting for dam construction, a fuel tank dropping from an Iranian plane, and friendly fire.
The explosion came as Iran's intelligence chief accused the United States of flying spy drones over its nuclear sites and threatened to shoot down the aircraft. But a spokesman for Iran's Interior Ministry said the blast was heard minutes after an Iranian airplane flew over the southwestern port town of Deylam, about 110 miles north of the nuclear plant, and had not been caused by a hostile attack.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=505340
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Iran: Blast came during dam job
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6979561/

TEHRAN, Iran - An explosion in south Iran, initially reported as caused by a missile, was blasting work during the construction of a dam, a senior military officer confirmed to state television on Wednesday.

advertisement
“What happened was only a natural part of building work. These were heavy blasts carried out for the construction of the dam,” said Ali Reza Afshar, deputy to the chief of staff of the armed forces.

Rescue teams were sent to the area, state-run al-Alam television said, without providing details on casualties.

Al-Alam caused the initial alarm when it reported the explosion was caused by an unidentified aircraft firing a missile in a deserted area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can't blame them for being jumpy...
...given the recent rhetoric by Condi Rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I am surprised
That they are not saving blasting materials for making IEDs to use after the US invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm willing to bet there's no shortage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ABC, AP still report there are still 3 conflicting reasons being given...
...and the dam work is one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Rescue teams sent to "natural part of building work?"
Well, this story continues to not make a whole lot of sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. That's why it is still developing
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 03:15 PM by jswordy
The AP just updated that it is likely a plane fuel tank. That's the lead at 1:25 p.m. CST.

Under edit: Second most likely cause is friendly fire, AP says. Quotes Iranian official who says friendly fire in that area not unusual in past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. This report says it was road work. (?)
http://asia.news.yahoo.com/050216/afp/050216155720top.html

TEHRAN (AFP) - A powerful explosion in southern Iran which raised jitters of a possible attack on the country's nuclear installations, was a result of road blasting, a senior security official said.

"It was an explosion set deliberately to blast through rock and open a road," Supreme National Security Council spokesman Agha Mohammadi told AFP. "In no circumstances was it an attack against the Islamic republic's nuclear installations." :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. OOPS!
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 03:11 PM by Walt Starr
Wrong thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Was the first mention of 'axis of evil' at the SOTU of 2001? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. How heavy is fuel - could it be loaded on a drone instead of the spy
equipment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's rather heavy.
1 gallon of gasoline equals 5.8 to 6.5 lbs.
1 gallon of ethanol equals 6.59 lbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The RQ-1 Predator has a payload of 2000 lbs (reported)
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 03:41 PM by seriousstan
http://www.globalaircraft.org/planes/rq-1_predator.pl

I don't think it is an either or proposition. Most of the "spy" equipment is dual purpose spy/navigation/targeting.

The larger RQ-4 Global Hawk is not reported to have a payload capability. Of course, neither did the Predator until it obliterated six suspected al-Qa'ida terrorists in Yemen on November 3, 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Please tell me the Iranians aren't building a dam upstream of the reactor?
In any case, is it a good idea to have a dam and a nuclear reactor so close to one another?

I mean, if the plant explodes, it could take the dam with it. Or if the dam breaks, take the plant with it.

Then again, maybe it's a small dam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC