Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kline introduces bill to put Reagan on $50 bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Dickie Flatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:49 PM
Original message
Kline introduces bill to put Reagan on $50 bill
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/10868564.htm?1c

Rep. John Kline wants former President Ronald Reagan to adorn $50 bills, where we would replace Ulysses S. Grant, a Civil War general who went on to become president.

Kline, who served as a military aide to Reagan, said the former president "was guided by unwavering principles and a steadfast character."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd..
rather put him on a slug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT!!!
US Grant believed in Civil Rights and a Balanced Budget. US Grant not only had the Civil Rights Act of 1871 Passed (The Anti-KKK Act) but also the Civil Rights Act of 1875 which had it NOT been struck-ed down by the Supreme Court in the 1880s would have done almost everything (Except for discrimination against women) that was done when the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed.

A brief description of the Civil Rights Acts:
http://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/dye4/medialib/docs/civrit.htm

The Actual Civil Rights Acts of 1866, 1871, 1870, 1871 and 1875:
http://aalto.arch.ksu.edu/jwkplan/law/Civil%20Rights%20Acts%20of%201866%2C%201870%2C%201871%2C%201875.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. I think Kikosexy2 meant Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I Know but it was just to tempting.....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
72. Put him on "National toilet paper" instead
Official US TP. Only problem is I would be tempted to go and wipe my ass even when I hadn't taken a crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. Putting Reagan on the 37 cent postage stamp was way too generous
IMO the two cent stamp was where Reagan belonged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Our history down the tubes for dummies like Reagan who does not
even come close to the strength and important to this country as our fore fathers. What is wrong with these repubs, really what ?

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
57. Reagan was a dummy
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 12:25 AM by TwentyFive
But, that goes to show how easily people are fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. They should put him on an IOU.
Why not, it's his legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Snap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, a T-note. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. Good answer! lol eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where do these people get this idea
that Mr. Reagan walked on freakin' water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
46. Why, these same nuts think * is God. I had ten times the respect
for Reagan then I have for * and I didn't like Reagan but I despise *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. whatever
Doesn't matter to me if it's a drunk or a senile dementia patient on the $50 bill, neither one gets my respect. Since Reagan's administration was so often compared to Grant's -- as in, "The Reagan administration is the most corrupt since U.S. Grant" then it seems appropriate to me. Better this than the dime.




The conservation movement is a breeding ground of communists
and other subversives. We intend to clean them out,
even if it means rounding up every birdwatcher in the country.
--John Mitchell, US Attorney General 1969-72


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
73. Wanna put a revered Republican on the $50?
How about Eisenhower? At least he was a genuine war hero, and he loved his country more than he loved his politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ack! Not the 50!
My favorite bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well
They had to find one of the few presidents worse than Reagan to replace on US currency.

Democrats may want to counter with a bill to name an aircraft carrier the USS Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
50. Grant worse than Reagan?
Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_B_Jackson Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
62. Sadly...
can't name a carrier after the Big Dog...the Rethuglicans named the last two Nimitz-class carriers after the senile old coot and Junior's poppy.

Just makes me want to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. No way, Reagan was guided by McCarthyism and racism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Reagan was a stool-pigeon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Illinois would be against this...
As should anybody who lives in the Union states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Jesus KEE- RIST !!!!... enough already with Raygun
Why stop there.. Why not just rename the country.. Reaganistan and be DONE with it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
I'll never look at another $50.00 bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latteromden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. What IS it with Minnesotan Republicans wanting to put Reagan on EVERYTHING
recently? First, it was a highway. Then, it was the State Office Building. Now, they want to force this insanity on the rest of the country and put him on the 50? Good lord!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. Souder of Indiana was first wanting the dip on the dime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
47. Let them, when I get a fifty I'll draw horns on it. eom
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 11:31 PM by genieroze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. My great grandma and many other southerners refused to use the $50
because it had Grant on it. There is still a lingering distaste for the $50 bill in many rural conservative areas of the south.

Grant is actually a distant relative of mine, but most of my Southern relatives won't reveal this information in public!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
45. Well I won't use a $50 bill with reagan on it
that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. He should be on the 1million dollar USTreasury Bill..
And he should have one finger in the air and a bubble that says "Feed the Beast!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Put him on the telephone bill...................
that's about all the dead, criminal, bastard deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
61. Well, if the economy keeps heading south
...those fifties will be like Iraqi dinars...cheaper to wipe your ass with them than to haul a garbage bag of bills to the store to buy some butt wipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Here on Planet Reagan..i thought all things were created by and are Reagan
so why bother.. ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. I still say what should be named for him
is his true legacy - the deficit. The Reagan Memorial Deficit.

Either that or that Fresh Kills landfill that's visible from space. That'd be appropriate. The Reagan Memorial Giant Landfill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why the hell not? And while we're at it...
why don't we just replace the word "President" with the word "Reagan", much like Ancient Rome! They had their Caesars, it's long overdue that we got our Reagans!

So President Bush's new ceremonial name will become Reagan Bush, and President Kerry would have been Reagan Kerry!

Think how wonderful that would be...:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. ...I said it before when the Reagan Dime came up...
...put him on the quarter, two-bit president that he was. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. Why not have * on the haypenny and Reagan on the $2 bill?


http://www.theadamsagency.com/$2bill.php

Grant may not of been one of our best President's, but at least he didn't leave us a legacy..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. how appropriate for the decline of America....
after all his tax cuts started our
swift decline despite what Clinton
did or didn't do.b
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Since I don't recall ever seeing an actual
$50 bill, this would at least be preferable to putting him on some currency that gets used frequently. I fear St. Ronnie's appearance on some sort of legal tender is inevitable. Plus, bills are much easier to deface than coins!

(Defacing money is illegal, and I recommend that you never, ever do such a thing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
49. Defacing money is illegal? No it isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Quite correct, genieroze!
SPENDING defaced money is illegal.

Defacing it, in and of itself, is perfectly legal.
And, if done properly, it's a friggin' ART FORM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. SPENDING defaced money is illegal, not unless you try and alter
it's value.
http://www.lawforkids.org/speakup/view_question.cfm?id=407

Answer: There is no law or statute against simply writing on a cash bill. For instance, it is not against the law to draw giant red lips on George Washington's portrait on the front of a One Dollar Bill.

However defacing currency with the intent to alter the bill to gain a benefit is illegal. If someone alters a written instrument (such as a check) without permission and with the intent to gain a benefit, then it is called forgery, which is a crime. If one tried to alter a cash bill (like changing a $5 bill to a $20 bill) for the purpose of presenting the altered bill to gain a benefit, then that could be considered a forgery. Forgery of United States Currency in this manner is called counterfeiting and carries with it very stiff penalties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Thank you, genieroze.
That is very useful information. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. Considering that the Republicans have made our currency worthless
I say plaster their faces all over the worthless bills!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well at least it'll be fun
blacking out his teeth, crossing his eyes and graphically dis-respecting St. ronnie on a bill that I know will be seen by many of his mush brained disciples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kline is such a tool
I'll never underdstand how that ass got reelected.

If Teresa Daly (his opponent in 2004 for those of you not in Minnesota) had been smart the only ad she would have had to run was one using Kline's quote about how the issues he worked on were "too complex for the average housewife in Burnsville to understand." I know several women (Republicans included) who nearly exploded when they heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Pshah, Daly Was Too Much of A Repub Clone
She couldn't distinguish herself from Kline AT ALL. I think the only point where they differed is that she wants a balanced budget. Otherwise, keeping rich people from being OPRESSED by the "death tax" is A-OK with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. Put Reagan on the "minus 3 trillion dollar" bill
That was the debt he ran up. It was 1 trillion when he took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LinuxInsurgent Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
80. good one...
so...is Bush the minus 7 trillion...and counting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. Would it still be worth $50?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. Put Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein on There, Too
They were all such good bedfellows. Oh, and don't forget the Islamic Jihad. They appreciated Ollie's arms. Perhaps, we could bribe all the present-day terrorists in the world with these blood-stained $50s.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. we should let them do it, its a good political cookie
but with the understanding that we will be expecting them to scratch our backs soon for our issues..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. You don't understand: they never pay back
As Junior's brother-in-law likes to say: "I just want my fair share, which is all of it."

There is no reciprocity from this mob, and that's something that even a sharp guy like Clinton will never understand. They will not play fair. They will demand their way, force their way, TAKE their way, and complain about how they're being ill-treated. He tried to play nice with them, and still does, hoping that they'll call off the dogs someday, but they never will.

You need look no further than the judicial appointments; they sat on so many during Clinton's time that a crisis brewed, and when they rammed through virtually all of Junior's nazis, even that wasn't enough for them.

Liberalism is based upon the understanding that different beliefs deserve to coexist; conservatism defines anything different as unholy and deserving of nothing short of destruction. They'll give you nothing for your kindness except renewed efforts to take even more from you.

This is no joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #53
59. You're right - they are like cockroaches. They only think of taking. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDEM2004 Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
37. It was just redesigned
Why waste more money on Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroubleMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. Hold on.....$50 is way to much money for me to wipe my ass with.

put him on GI toilet paper or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. Nancy, please tell them to STFU ... AGAIN. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. Democrats should offer a counterproposal..
put Eisenhower on the $50 bill, see how many Republicans vote against it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
42. Reagan should be on the
trillion dollar bill (cash value 1/100 cent).

Let's print up a bunch of them, pay off our creditors (except SS) with them ("Keep the change.") and pass out the rest as souvenirs.

Fiscal irresponsibility of Reaganite proportions should not be rewarded. And one can argue that without Reagan's peacetime fiscal irresponsibility, our current fiscal irresponsibility would have, at least, proven much more difficult, if not impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NIGHT TRIPPER Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #42
67. Put Reagan on the FOOD STAMP-- that would look real fine
Or on the Tax refund checks for the wealthy.

Keep him away from our money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
43. Too expensive -- most people can't afford
to wipe their asses with $50 bills. And it would be SO tempting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. I thought it was going to say the $50 billion dollar bill
that would be more appropriate.

I say if they put him on the dollar, lets get a condom manufacturer to put his face on a condom brand, call it "Ray-gun", the tag line can be "bang one for the Gipper" or something.

(In acknowlegement of how AIDS turned into an epidemic on his watch, when it didn't have to.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. Grant wasn't a great president, but he was a BRILLIANT general
Bitter Southerners will never accept this, but he was a much better commander than Lee: he understood maneuver, communications and logistics in a way that a talented tactical field commander like Lee never could. Add to this that Grant was a fabulous tactical commander, and there's no comparison. He's been tarred as a attritionist, but that completely discounts most of his campaigns and simply plays into the ongoing myth of the Southern superiority.

Boy do I know this; I have family on both sides and am descended from notables from each army. The South's collective self-image of manhood was trampled because they thought they were superior, and they have yet to get over it.

Reagan was a serviceable actor, a mob tool as an adminstrator of SAG and a mean thug for privilege as president. He excelled at nothing, whereas Grant (along with Sherman) was a towering figure in the history of warfare, and ushered in the modern era of generalship in ways that are only now being acknowledged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DivinBreuvage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. Thank you for this wonderful post
Even here on DU there are far too many people who buy into the myth of "Grant the butcher" or who fail to realize that -- contrary to the popular saw that "history is written by the winners" -- the South has been writing America's Civil War history since 1865.

People who parrot the "Grant the butcher" meme should be forced to explain the difference between the Vickbsurg and Gettysburg campaigns.

They should also be asked to identify the Civil War general who suffered higher casualty rates than US Grant (hint: it was Robert E. Lee).

They should also be asked to identify the Civil War general who, when he ran out of ideas, continued to rely on suicidal frontal assaults after Grant and Sherman had figured out such tactics were hopeless (hint: it was Robert E. Lee).

Your idea that the South's collective self-image of manhood was trampled is fascinating to me, one that I had never heard or considered before, but it seems to me, now that I hear it, to get closer to the heart of the matter than any other explanation I have yet heard. Very well done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #58
66. Well, hot damn!
Vicksburg was absolutely masterful: it was maneuver, bluff and control of initiative par excellence. The mere mention of that campaign brings joy to my heart.

There were plenty of good commanders on both sides who've been overblown or unfairly dismissed. One of my blood kin (John Bell Hood) is shockingly overrated, while another (Joseph E. Johnson) was underrated and badly misused due to the idiocy of Jeff Davis. Lee is lauded, while Forrest is arguably the greatest commander of the entire war. (Hell, he's one of the best of all time, period.) Meade is forgotten, although he won Gettysburg, and even though Lincoln was annoyed by him, Grant retained him as a key Corps commander. Nobody ever talks about Thomas, but he was a true stalwart. Sherman is only remembered as a looter, when he was a true genius of modern warfare.

It goes on and on; I can hardly think of a war that has more key players more misrepresented. Mercifully, Davis was an arrogant fool and the South died by its own sword.

Glad we're in accord; there's hope yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
54. How about a ceremonial rubber check or the Trillion Dollar Bill
Let's put him on the Trillion Dollar bill since he was the first Repug to blow out a huge deficit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudbluestater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
60. Makes sense to me, playing to his "base." Only person I know who
likes to flash 50s is my ex. I like the 20s, the common man's currency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
63. All I can say is "UUUUck" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
64. Most Democrats dont see too many of those anyway.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
65. Don't bother the bill. Besides, Reagan is a divisve figure. Grant has been
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 02:06 AM by w4rma
dead long enough that he is no longer divisive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
68. bah!
heh. no chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
69. Grant was a far better servent of his country than Reagan.
However, Republicans don't give two shits about history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
70. Put him on the $1 bill...
Then I can afford to wipe my ass on "Dutch" more often...

What's that you say? I'm being "Disrespectful of the Dead"?

I didn't say anything about Jerry Garcia...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #70
81. It fits...Reagan should be on the dollar bill
in honor of him 'passing the buck'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
71. Only if they let us design the back!
My vote: Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keroro gunsou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
74. Why not..
Harry S Truman for the $50?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
76. A reminder Reagan's budget deficits will ultimately mean a $50 bill
will be needed to purchase what once a buck would once buy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
77. Reagan should be on the $1000 bill.
I saw a really cool letter to the editor in my paper. A guy said, "Reagan should be on the $1000 bill. That way, the people for whom he and the Republican party worked so hard can see him all the time, and the rest of us don't have to."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LinuxInsurgent Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
78. please NO....
I'd rather prefer Grant, whose administration had been the most corrupt in U.S. history (Until W. Bush), but who at least had his Civil War glory to his name.

It's already bad enough that Reagan's got an airport and carrier with his name on it. He was a horrible President, from the domestic side of things...and he was hated around the world, especially the browner parts of the Third World...

Not something we should be immortalizing in our currency...Kennedy, FDR, the Founders, Abe Lincoln...yeah...that's the America I want to belong to...but not to Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LinuxInsurgent Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
79. I just thought of somethign...
there's a good way to protest this, if it occurs...simply take every $50.00 dollar bill you have...and mark it with a Hitler Mustache, and write "Seig Heil" under it.

If everyone that opposes it does that, there will be a stream of $50.00 out there making a political statement for us all the time...

Even Republicans will have to proudly hold their Hitler Reagans...hahaha...cause no one will throw away $50.00!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC