Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DoJ Questions Microsoft's Compliance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:47 PM
Original message
DoJ Questions Microsoft's Compliance
Edited on Mon Jul-07-03 01:48 PM by phoebe
The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) and the 16 states that reached the November 2002 anti-trust settlement agreement with Microsoft, said last week "numerous concerns" still exist with Microsoft's compliance efforts.

In the first status report to U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who oversaw the settlement agreement, the primary concern of the plaintiffs is Microsoft's post-settlement efforts at setting licensing and royalty rates for allowing competitors access to its communications protocols.

snip

The plaintiffs now claim they may have to seek a court order to force Microsoft to lease the technical information in a "reasonable and non-discriminatory manner." The DoJ and the states also complain of Microsoft's slowness in complying with the licensing settlement terms.

Under those terms, Microsoft was required to implement reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms for the MCPP within 90 days of the final settlement. The plaintiffs argue that Microsoft has not complied with those terms.

http://dc.internet.com/news/article.php/2231891

Good article here..
http://www.pcworld.com/dart_house/pcw/pcw_houseads/PopUnder/smartcertifywindow3.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. When DoJ is complaining about compliance
You know it's bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
govegan Donating Member (661 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. This story broke July 4 in the Seattle-PI
At any rate, this is the most interesting quote from the P-I article:

"It's not a surprise that it's not working," said Norman Hawker, a Western Michigan University business professor and research fellow at the American Antitrust Institute, which opposed the antitrust settlement. "The states and the federal government were warned in voluminous comments on the settlement that these were the kinds of problems that would result. They're reaping what they sowed."

The bushista DOJ is so clearly pro-M$, that I seriously doubt any meaningful pursuit of actual compliance with the so-watered-down-as-to-be-virtually-meaningless legal decision, anyway.

Here is a link to the P-I article: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/129487_msftcompliance04.html.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC