Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Iraq Force Is Seen As Likely To Grow (More Troops needed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 10:58 PM
Original message
WP: Iraq Force Is Seen As Likely To Grow (More Troops needed)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A2565-2004Nov21?language=printer

Senior U.S. military commanders in Iraq say it is increasingly likely they will need a further increase in combat forces to put down remaining areas of resistance in the country.

Convinced that the recent battle for Fallujah has significantly weakened insurgent ranks, commanders here have devised plans to press the offensive into neighborhoods where rebels have either taken refuge after fleeing Fallujah or were already deeply entrenched.

But the forces available for these intensified operations have become limited by the demands of securing Fallujah and overseeing the massive reconstruction effort there -- demands that senior U.S. military officers say are likely to tie up a substantial number of Marines and Army troops for weeks.

"What's important is to keep the pressure on these guys now that we've taken Fallujah from them," a high-ranking U.S. military commander said, speaking on condition he not be named because of the sensitivity of the deliberations on adding more troops. "We're in the pursuit phase. We have to stay after these guys so they don't get their feet set."

The possibility that additional troops would be required to battle the insurgency in this critical period preceding the Iraqi elections, scheduled for Jan. 30, has been signaled for weeks. The Pentagon took an initial step in this direction last month, ordering about 6,500 soldiers in Iraq to extend their tours by up to two months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1.  far off the mark
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 11:06 PM by pinkpops


fix link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. No. Wrong. I urgently disagree.
Fuck the "rule of force". It never works,...anyone who believes otherwise,...PROVE IT!!

Yup. Hail Hitler for the "rule of force",...and you know F-A-I-L-U-R-E!!!

Flood "survival" via food, clothing & shelter,...into a country that WAS OTHERWISE STABLE (YOU FUCKING POWER-MONGERING, EAGER, ARROGANT, ASSHOLES),...

,...and there MAY be a PLAN FOR PEACE!!!!

It really sucks that the most out-of-freakin'-touch humans on the face of this earth,...are believing themselves so above us all. Someday, even though I'll want to piss all over them,...I'll merely address them,...for what they are,...for what they choose to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingChicken Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sending more into this mistake, just like Vietnam, won't fix the long term
Short term objectives can be completed with more troops, but this is making a commitment in a place that is like quicksand to us. They will keep sending more and more to fix the short term tactical problems, but in the long run we are going nowhere. Do they really think this is going to go away by simply killing the insurgents, is our Military so stupid to overlook the big picture of the coming generations of fighters and foreign jihadists that are bound to result from our long term occupation? It has just begun, welcome to the next level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC