You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Vaginal ultrasounds are often painful and traumatic. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Vaginal ultrasounds are often painful and traumatic.
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 02:02 AM by Lyric
Those probes are cold, hard, and can be painful if you're tense or upset or naturally small inside. The vagina tends to tense up and refuse entry when a woman is nervous, upset, or scared, so forcing this thing inside of her before an abortion (which is obviously an occasion for fear, anxiety, and/or grief) is just heinous. It can HURT, no matter how much lube they put on it. At least in terms of the vaginal sensations felt by an unwilling woman who's being forced by the state to undergo this, those things might as well be rape sticks. It's one thing if you're undergoing this willingly because you're pregnant and the doctor needs to check on the baby's progress. That makes the experience at least a neutral one, if not a positive one. But THIS?

Now that I think of it, I don't see anything mentioned about an exception for victims of rape--so what, they're going to insist that raped girls undergo forced penetration AGAIN? What if the girl is 12 years old? What if she has vaginal damage from the rape that hasn't completely healed yet? What if she's suffering PTSD in the aftermath of the rape, and this sends her spiraling into a complete mental breakdown? What kind of evil bastards THINK of this shit?

I have a great idea for a new Texas law. Mandatory, un-sedated colonoscopies for all new legislators before they're allowed to run for office. They have to be awake and watching the screen, and THEY have to pay for it. After all--the state has a vested interest in ensuring that its lawmakers aren't going to keel over from colon cancer within a year of being elected.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC