You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: I'd say that's quite a stretch. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. I'd say that's quite a stretch.
The OP makes reference to women being part of the 99%, and does not support your inference. Women are more likely to live in poverty and less likely to be among the super-rich; thus, the OP is correct that women are part of the 99%.

Also, your supposition that women make up 'probably' half of the 1% is not supported. Taking a quick look at the Forbes list of the wealthiest Americans, it looks to be closer to ten to one, at least among the top 100.

Most people are part of the 99%, regardless of gender. However, I don't think it's wrong to include this aspect of institutionalized inequity in the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC