Basically everyone agreed that the person did have SOME real damages but was requesting an inflated amount based on some flimsy evidence, so it was just a question of hashing out every individual thing he claimed and adjusting it depending on the evidence the provided. He got about 1/5 what he asked for. I really think everyone was trying to be very fair to both parties and follow the judge's guidelines on what the burden of proof was for each thing.
It was nice that nobody just said "oh lets just say X and we can all go home." I mean not one person, everybody wanted to really get it right, it was very affirming!
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
