You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: I really don't think this is what's behind Cain's 'rise.' [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. I really don't think this is what's behind Cain's 'rise.'
It could be a part of it, but only a very small part. I think other factors are far more important:

1) The Republicans have been in 'flavor of the week' mode since July, when Bachmann was rising. She was replaced by Perry as the candidate of the moment and the spotlight moved to Cain after that. Today it's Chris Christie and that will be over before we know it too.

2) Cain has performed well in the debates. He hasn't made gaffes and he hasn't been challenged too much. He also doesn't have nearly as much in his record to defend as Perry or Romney.

3) He's actively courting the Tea Party and tells them what they want to hear. This isn't rocket science here. If you cast your lot with a certain subset of the base, that subset is more likely to accept you.

4) Race. This is where Garofalo comes in. She calls it 'hiding racism.' I call it 'desperately trying to show your non-racism.' In the end, both are pretty close to being the same thing. It all depends on your opinion and perspective.

Now, the reasons that Garofalo is saying this seem to be more about her than about Cain or the Republicans. Remember when that guy on CNBC (I forget his name) ranted about the bailouts on air? That clip was replayed on tv and spread on the internet and has been cited as a moment in the birth of the Tea Party. Garofalo's rant about the Tea Party 'not wanting a black man in office' on Countdown was the equivalent moment for the 'Tea Party is racist' argument. She was one of the first people to clearly state that argument in an MSM outlet and the comment was picked up and spread around, just like the CNBC rant was. Neither were necessarily decisive -- there would still be a Tea Party without the bailout rant and people would still think that the Tea Party was racist without Garofalo, but it was important.

Problem is, Cain's rise in the polls throws a wrench into her argument that the sole motivating force behind the Tea Party was getting a black man out of the White House. She's having to work harder to make that argument stick and this comment reflects that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC