He never said he "approved of the murder of 3,000"
He pointed out the obvious issue we all should have been addressing - what are the ramifications of our actions around the world. When our leaders bomb countries or get involved in conflicts we have no business in (oh wait except there might oil involved) we put thousands of innocent lives in jeopardy or worse kill them.
Were the terrorists right to attack us? No. Do the civilians of other countries that we have intervened in have a right to be angry at our government? Yes.
We cannot put our heads in the sand and ignore the effect our actions have on the world.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
