You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Yes. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes.
The 1983 FICA tax increase was designed to build a surplus. For years, Social Security's receipts exceeded expenditures. That's how the Social Security Trust Fund was built up.

When Bush was advocating privatization, he was pushing this "Social Security bankruptcy" idea. It was based on projections that, sometime in the 2020's, the system's annual surplus would turn into an annual deficit. At that point, continued payment of full benefits would require the Social Security Administration to begin redeeming the bonds that were in the Social Security Trust Fund. The bonds would be completely redeemed, and the Trust Fund exhausted, sometime in the 2040's. At that point, the system's current receipts from FICA taxes would be adequate to pay only about 75% of benefits.

The projection Bush favored were criticized as being based on unreasonably pessimistic assumptions about long-term economic growth. As it turned out, the projections were too optimistic in the short term, not having included the Bush recession. For the long term, the uncertainty is, necessarily, even greater. It's possible that the Trust Fund will never be exhausted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC