You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: A worthy hypothesis. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. A worthy hypothesis.
It's probably always best to stay open minded about these things. It's possible that generally good guys could consider doing something foolish or dangerous, and it possibly just 5 dimensional chess that is going on over our heads. Sometimes it's not easy to totally rule either one out.

I like your point though that 5 dimensional chess could anticipate certain public outcries and factor them into the strategy. I don't mind playing the role of reacting strongly against bad ideas to further brilliant chess moves if in fact that is what is happening. I just don't think it fair or reasonable to ask me to be silent about bad ideas, regardless of what is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC