You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: Hmmmm? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Hmmmm?
Edited on Mon Sep-12-11 05:58 PM by ProSense
"Yeah, I don't think a counter to my argument was in the talking points memo sent out from HQ! Although I think those that spout the straight party line..."

Yeah, I'm sure that was what Dean Baker was doing.

So you want a counter to this: "do you now admit that the great argument saying "Social Security does not add one dime to the deficit" is no longer a true statement?

Why would I admit to a stupid point?

Let me repeat: The fact is that replenishing Social Security is irrelevant to the program's structure in term of contributing to the deficit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC