You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Here's the thing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Here's the thing
No one is 'unfailingly accurate'. It is that simple. Nate is strong with numbers, he is not as strong with the human elements, the random happenings, and the general chaos of an election year. He has one way of looking at things, but that one way is not a full view of the events at hand. Many elections in history have been swayed in surprising ways by uncontrollable events that occur beyond anyone's predictions. The numbers do not reflect those elements at all.
The numbers are not unfailingly accurate, nor is anyone who predicts the future. No one. No matter how smart or how liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC