You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: It's All Implicit At This Point... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. It's All Implicit At This Point...
We all believe what we want to...or take the words of those "in the know"...but neither of us have any idea what the ramifications of either House or Senate bill will be. Lots of conjecture, but that's creating a lot of spin and disinformation. Yes, the status quo means millions will go bankrupt due to the inability to afford insurance, but both bills address stipends to those who will have problems meeting the premiums. We also hear wide claims as to what the "cadillac tax" would entail...which policies and incomes would be taxed. It'd be pound foolish for Democrats (or any politician) to favor a bill that will cost their constituents more than what it delivers. Thus I "split the difference" in much of what I hear from all sides with the truth lying somewhere in the middle.

Little improvement is better than none...or worse...scaring politicians away from this serious issue until something catastrophic happens. A bill that doesn't increase coverage is a failure by all accounts. The Senate bill includes 10,000 health clinics...that's not presumption, that's in the bill. The plan to create some kind of financial assistance to those with no or limited coverage or based on income is also part of both bills that is sure to help millions. Lastly the ban on cancellation based pre-existing conditions WILL save lives.

Again...the bill is far from what I had hoped for and see the need for revisions in the future, but that's what happens to many bills of this stature. The options right now are to take what's being offered and use it as a framework for fixing...which can be done a lot easier than walking away and hoping to start all over.

I'll stand with people like Paul Krugman, Bernie Sanders and Howard Dean on this one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC