You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #246: age appropriate. wide range of age, with what will do what to a child and reaction of child. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #242
246. age appropriate. wide range of age, with what will do what to a child and reaction of child.
when using harmful, i am not talking about psychological breakdown, forever have to deal with. momentarily, and in the scheme of things in a lifetime, momentary is just that.

i dont look at dead anything now, anymore than i did then. no, i do not have a curiousity. was surprised soph biology how much i enjoyed dissecting, but then i was 14 too. still dont like to see dead.

a 1, 2, 3, 4 yr old walking down the street probably will not have the instinct of curiousity, but a real pain seeing the cruelty of (and i am not saying a bad way. would be one to set and talk with little one, explaining as part of life). probably will end up with a couple days or more sadness, or not wanting to be alone or challenge sleeping, (when closing eyes, seeing it again). unless that child is accustomed to it. many people do not experience dead deer. so walking up on it, yes, ... can be "harmful", not the end of the world.

i think it is kinda mean to do to little kids, but so many on this board think we ought to have little adults at 1.... all world lesson learned immediately without allowing the time to learn them, and age appropriately.

i lived on the farm, and as much as my brothers demanded i toughen up, and not be so prissy, i never did. not who i was. reaching 50 and brother still has conversation about why i would not accept certain things living on a farm. i finally told him... not who i was, am or will be, suck it up. not all of us are the same and cannot force certain behaviors on all.

sad at death is a normal thing. and no, i do not believe it is an automatic curiosity to that death. many would shun and turn away, not walk to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC