You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: There are a couple of ways it can be addressed. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. There are a couple of ways it can be addressed.
I like the idea of a 21st-century Homestead Act whereby the federal government buys the mortgage from the lender at 60 cents on the dollar.

Feds now own the note.

Homeowner signs a contract with HUD to maintain the home, property taxes, etc. for a period of 5 years during which time homeowner cannot sell the property. If the homeowner moves during during the 5 years, they forfeit any claim to the property.

But if the homeowner stays, at the end of 5 years, they can sell the property for no less than the amount the government paid for the note. The homeowner could retain any proceeds from the sale in excess of the amount indebted to the feds.

Without having to pay for housing, millions of unemployed and underemployed could direct their small incomes to living expenses, education, and other costs of living that help stimulate other economic activity. The homeowner would also receive no income tax refunds during the 5 year period.

Everybody wins or at least mitigates their losses.

* Lender gets something and avoids the expense of foreclosure.

* Family gets to stay in house.

* Other property owners in the neighborhood don't have to suffer the blight of a rash empty homes driving down the value of their properties.

* Money spent by feds on unemployment benefits doesn't become additional bank bailout money, but instead is spent on new purchases. Jobs return to fill demand created by new spending.



There are other ideas, too, however. I rather like the one that turns some wealth DOWN the ladder rather than UP the ladder for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC