You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #96: A stinging slap on the wrist, or noisy but painless clap to a well padded rear ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
96. A stinging slap on the wrist, or noisy but painless clap to a well padded rear ...
...is a damned site more effective that initiating a game of "Let's outsmart/manouever mum/dad." by attempting distraction or removing the object of fascination. Eventually, no matter how careful you are, the odds are damned good that a child will be in a position to investigate unhindered. Far far better to establish an autonomous pain aversion response, than to rely on mantaining a totally "antiseptic" environment.

Generally it only takes a very small number of stings, before a two finger touch to the wrist is sufficent reminder not to touch. And then as language skills become established a verbal reminder "Is that yours?" soon suffices. The final result, generally well before their third birthday, is a child who will ask permision before reaching and who will accept "no" as an answer without demure or a shrieking tantrum.


Several hundred million years of evolution has gone into establishing pain aversion as a (arguably the) primary survival mechanism. There is not a nurturing creature on this planet that does not use in the rearing of its young.


Should it be used as the ONLY mechanism? Of course not.


Other methods: time out, grounding, removal of privileges, etc ARE NOT pain free. They are simply the substitution of emotional pain for physical. Furthermore, any "marks" left by misapplication are generally not immediately obvious, and may indeed not manifest until many years later.

A major shortcoming of "modern" child rearing techniques is that they are not terribly effective, unless they are applied with 100% consitency AND in a manner that pretty much has to be tailored to the individual needs and peculiarities of each and every separate child.

Any idiot can quickly learn exactly when, and how hard to spank. (Which is fortunate, given that any idiot can become a parent.) However, it takes a good deal of specialised training, the ability to adsorb such and a high degree of empathy to effectively apply "enlightened" childrearing methods. This is why accredited childcare now generally requires at least diploma level, if not degree level education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC