You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: From a famous piece by Gloria Steinem, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. From a famous piece by Gloria Steinem,
Ms. Magazine, October 1978
If Men Could Menstruate

excerpt (much more of this very quotable essay at link):
http://www.livingsexuality.com/2009/09/30/if-men-could-menstruate/

{snip}
So what would happen if suddenly, magically, men could menstruate and women could not?

Clearly, menstruation would become an enviable, boast-worthy, masculine event:
Men would brag about how long and how much. Young boys would talk about it as the envied beginning of manhood. Gifts, religious ceremonies, family dinners, and stag parties would mark the day.

To prevent monthly work loss among the powerful, Congress would fund a National Institute of Dysmenorrhea. Doctors would research little about heart attacks, from which men were hormonally protected, but everything about cramps. Sanity supplies would be federally funded and free. Of course, some men would still pay for the prestige of such commercial brands as Paul Newman Tampons, Muhammad Ali Rope-a-Dope Pads, John Wayne Maxi Pads, and Joe Namath Jock Shields – “For Those Light Bachelor Days.”

Statistical surveys would show that men did better at sports and won more Olympic medals during their periods.

Generals, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation (”men-struation”) as proof that only men could serve God and country in combat (”You have to give blood to take blood”), occupy high political office (”Can women be properly fierce without a monthly cycle governed by the planet Mars?”), be priests, ministers, God Himself (”He gave this blood for our sins”), or rabbis (”Without a monthly purge of impurities, women are unclean”).

Male liberals or radicals, however, would insist that women are equal, just different: and that way a woman could join their ranks if only she were willing to recognise the primacy of menstrual rights (”Everything else is a single issue”) or self-inflict a major wound every month (”You must give blood for the revolution”).

Street guys would invent slang (”He’s a three-pad man”) and “give fives” on the corner with some exchange like, “Man, you lookin’ good!” “Yeah, man, I’m on the rag!”

TV shows would treat the subject openly. (Happy Days: Richie and Potsie try to convince Fonzie that he is still “The Fonz” though he has missed two periods in a row. Hill Street Blues: The whole precinct hits the same cycle.) So would newspapers. (SUMMER SHARK SCARE THREATENS MENSTRUATING MEN. JUDGE SITES MONTHLIES IN PARDONING RAPIST.) And so would movies. (Newman and Redford in Blood Brothers!)
{snip}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC