You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #132: You sir, have just waved your bare ass of ignorance for all to see [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #130
132. You sir, have just waved your bare ass of ignorance for all to see
The reason I didn't elaborate before is because this discussion is tangential since the 1st and 4th amendments have been fully incorporated. Apparently you have no such compunction about tangential discussions. But since you've decided to ignorantly accuse me of ignorance, I'm going to correct your fuck up. The Bill of Rights doesn't not universally apply to the states. Those rights must be incorporated. The 14th amendment did NOT automatically do this and in fact, most of them weren't incorporated until some 100 years AFTER the 14th amendment was ratified.

I could point to a number of USSC decisions that prove this, but it's much easier for you to just google the subject and better educate yourself.
http://www.google.com/search?q=bill+of+rights+incorporation

I guess I'm a bit more "well-informed" than you ever imagined, eh? And no I'm most certainly not going to even entertain any half-fast argument to the contrary on this subject. I'm quite sure I'm 100% right on this and you are 100% wrong. You can either admit it or not. I really don't care which. It's your burden of ignorance.

You may now apologize, assuming you have the character to do so.

As for the rest, all employers should also be subject to limits, among other things in the manufacture of new demands on their employees, which are often abused. That's why the TEA is not an absolute power, there are other institutions like the school board. She has been working the job for 22 years and has their support in refusing the search.


Small town Texas school boards(and even many of the larger towns) are generally composed of a high percentage of zealots and other various dipshits. It doesn't surprise me that they support this batshit crazy woman, but since their opinions matter about as much as yours (or mine for that matter) this is all irrelevant. The state school board is not budging, and since they recently found dozens of sex offenders working in public schools and at least one that got by the previous screening process, it's not likely they ever will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC