You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Peoples' Veto is the problem - but I contributed too [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
naturallyselected Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Peoples' Veto is the problem - but I contributed too

I have long had problems with Maine's Peoples' Veto. We elect representatives to make the laws - we may or may not agree with them. We never had the option of a Peoples' Veto for the Iraq War. When it comes to civil rights issues, "colored" folk (and I don't mean to offend anyone with that designation - I am using it as the phrase that could still be in common use if desegregation had been subject to a Peoples' Veto) would still be using separate water fountains if desegregation had been subject to a Peoples' Veto.

I woke deeply saddened this morning. I had faith in our state's basic fairness, and the importance to Mainers of the notion of "live and let live", even if they didn't agree with how others felt. And I'm ashamed of myself - I proudly wore my "No on 1" button, I tried to win over anyone who engaged me about it, but I should have done more. I should have gone door to door, made the phone calls. I apologize to all those who fought this battle harder than I, and I apologize to the thousands of Maine's gay citizens that I let down, and to the millions of gay US citizens who would have benefited from this particular domino falling.

I assumed too much. When it comes to peoples' fears, nothing can be assumed. For whatever reasons, many people have a visceral fear of anyone that's different than they are, and this fear was exploited shamelessly by the "Yes on 1" side. Ads that all but said our children would be taught about the details of gay sex in the classroom, turning a basic civil rights argument into something that preyed on peoples' fears about sexuality in general and gay sexuality in particular.

Yes, more young people should have come out to the polls yesterday - when I voted, I think I, at 55, was the youngest person in the room. Yes, the "No on 1" side should have stayed on message instead of letting the other side set the PR agenda. But I should have done more, and I hope I manage to find the time and energy to more actively join the struggle as it moves forward in Maine despite this setback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC