Reply #46: Kip Sullivan's article is sourced with primary sources. You can click on them and read [View All]

[John Q. Citizen]

the primary sources yourself.

You haven't even read the articles, have you?

Or if you have, why do you have zero rebuttal to them?

You can't refute them. You can only try to ask me to rewrite and resource them for you. But the sources, the primary sources are right their in the article.

They aren't op-ed. They aren't opinion, they are analysis.

What is it about the analysis that you find faulty? Or do you agree but wish to remain obtuse? Why is an article that's sourced not worthy of you refuting what you see as inaccurate or incorrect? If you see something that is inaccurate or incorrect that is.

You can't refute those articles, because you either haven't read them, or you know they are correct.