You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: This wouldn't be an issue if the laws mandated run-offs in case nobody won a majority of the vote. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. This wouldn't be an issue if the laws mandated run-offs in case nobody won a majority of the vote.
As it stands, even if the poll results are a true reflection of people's attitudes, it would mean there would be a run-off between Corzine and Christie because neither moved beyond the 50% + 1 threshold in the first round. Instead, we pick the victor who achieves a simple plurality. This is why there is a two-party monopoly in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC