Reply #70: If Oswald was a patsy, why did he tell so many provable lies under questioning? [View All]

[stopbush]

Like saying he didn't even own a rifle, when the FBI did the legwork and traced the purchase of the MC rifle from a surplus company in Chicago back to Oswald before the day was out (do you know who A. Hidell was? Do you know anything about Oswald's mailbox?). A rifle that was found at his place of employment, that his wife had taken pictures of with him holding it, that his neighbor saw in her garage, that had LHO's fingerprints AND palm prints on it when it was discovered in the TSBD (and that that palm print was found on the inside portion of the gun barrel in an area covered by the stock, proving that Oswald had re-assembled the gun at some point pre-shooting. Yet, he claimed he had never owned a rifle in his life.)?

If he was a patsy, why did he shoot Officer JD Tippett, a murder that was witnessed by 10 people? Why did he pull his revolver on the officer attempting to arrest him at the Texas Theater?

How about this: Oswald's entire behavior after the assassination, before and after he was apprehended, displayed a consciousness of guilt. Not that he was a patsy (of who?), but that he did the killing.