Reply #9: What we need is a logic, not passion, based revolution. [View All]

[originalpckelly]

Look at how compelling that rational argument is. It's so plain and easy to see. Pleas to emotion like most other people have tried to use to overthrow this system, make it seem as if this isn't as precise as science. This is a science, however, and it can have proofs and facts that are indisputable. I think the power of being able to prove this with logic will basically cause a massive worldwide revolution.

I want the same equal wealth distribution as the communists do, but I think it can be achieved through breaking up the system that sucks wealth from the people. In theory there should be equilibrium, or homeostasis (since the economy is an open system) in this economy, and that should equate to an equal distribution of wealth. Our gini coefficient has been increasing, if this system is following the laws of physics, that simply shouldn't be possible, as money is roughly equal to energy. And there's physics out there that suggests as time goes on, the equilibrium state of energy in a system has the highest probability of existing, and therefore is more like to actually happen. Something is amiss, something isn't working out right. And it's the system that sucks up capital from the people who create it.

I think past movements have taken the wrong direction. They get mad, instead of getting even.

My goal is to create an economic equilibrium, or something very close to it, so that people rise and fall based upon the content of their character, rather than the content of their master's character.