You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About the use of sexual epithets [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 01:01 PM
Original message
About the use of sexual epithets
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Thu Oct-30-08 01:47 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
We say "fuck" and "fucking" as all purpose emotion-strengtheners because of the decline of religion.

We process bad words in a different area of the brain, which is why some stroke victims can only cuss, or lose the ability to cuss.

The modern sexual epithets have been substituted for older religious taboo words because the religious terms no longer fire the bad-word aspect of expression.

That's why we have some nonsensical phrases like, "I don't give a fuck."

"Damn" has been replaced by "fuck" because damn just isn't a bad enough word any more.

Same for 'fucking' as an adjective in place of 'damned.' "Where's the fucking remote?"

At this point use of 'fuck,' and even "mother-fucker" has been largely disconnected from sexual context. (Just as 'damned' was long ago disconnected from images of the final judgment and hell-fire.)

If discrimination against all people who have sexual intercourse was rampant I might feel differently about "fucker" as a slur. Calling someone a member of a culturally 'secondary' class to put them down (woman, gay, black) is always offensive by implication.

So some words like 'cunt' and 'cocksucker' are not removed from all context, and remain offensive in ways 'fuck' does not. As epithets they leave the listener wondering what's so awful about a vulva or fellatio that would make such references stronger negatives than the word "Republican."

In some AA audiences 'nigger' has no power. In Britain 'cunt' has little power. But in most contexts in America they are both frightfully offensive words. It's a matter of how far a bad word has drifted in usage from conjuring specific meaning.

(The FCC recognizes this all-purpose bad word phenomenon in an odd way. You can use bad words to hurt people, but not to describe things. It is okay to call someone an 'asshole' on TV after 10PM, but not to refer an actual anus as an asshole.)

________________

ON EDIT: This post is spurred by me considering why I distinguish "cocksucker" as a genralized swear to describe a Republican or other bad person in the way we accept "dumb motherfucker." In most (though not all) of American society "Cocksucker" still conjures a real meaning. It means you are not a manly man, which is the only "good" class. Women and gay men who suck cock are presumed to be somehow contemptible, or else it wouldn't be a slur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC