You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #58: Now, that may be only partly true [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
RedLetterRev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Now, that may be only partly true
since what I heard (and again, it was only partly corroborated by an unnamed witness at a crisco and bondage party) that he is most definitely not into farm animals, but rather small animals. While it may or may not have been a gerbil, the source definitely noted it was of genus rodentia that was being introduced, shall we say, to a rather personal orifice. Now, Corsi hasn't denied this and I do find the MSM strangely silent about this occurrence. But I must be strong about this. My sources are adamant that he is not having sex with large four-legged animals.

Later, in complete refutation of the first claim of a normally unimpeachable source, it was noted that at the same crisco-and-bondage party he was seen praying on his knees in front of another male in the traditional pre-Christian manner, bowing rapidly at the shoulders. It was noted also that, in the manner of our dear Lord, he was also being flogged about the shoulders in atonement for the sinfulness having taken place around him. Our sources conflict on his prior participations, so we can only guess that he might have been present at the crisco-and-bondage party in actuality to save souls. Yes, that must be it! We must rightfully assume he was praying for the leather-clad sinner's soul, because a tithe was accepted, money changing hands, which we must further assume was immediately to be turned over to the church. Wouldn't this be right? Of course it must be. I read it on the internets somewhere.

Again, this is what our sources say, and as yet no-one has come forward to refute or deny either of the claims. I mean, if someone is going to spend time on his knees praying for a burley, leather-clad sinner, he may as well be collecting tithes, right? Oh, why won't MSM give Corsi beatitudes and praise for such selfless acts of prayerful kindness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC